Manipur
Hungpung, Phungyar, and Mailiang villages (Ukhrul district); Toupokpi, Chakpikarong, Pallel, Nungphura, Nungpal, Sajik Tampak & Haikot (Tengnoupal and Chandel Districts); Lunghar, Sihai Khullen, Nungbi, Phangrei, Singcha–Gamnon area (Ukhrul), Kwatha, Sibong, Khudengthabi, and Minou-Mangkang, etc (Tengnoupal and Chandel districts), Shingda and Singkap Blocks (Kamjong District), Leingangching to Chakpikarong (Chandel District)
,
Hungpung
,
Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Published :
Feb 2025
|
Updated :
Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2017
Year started
14945
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2017
Year started
14945
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Manipur, local communities and activists have been raising concerns over the signing of mining agreements in tribal villages without proper consultations.

The state government signed 39 MoUs with private companies to explore mineral resources like chromite, limestone, nickel, copper, malachite, azurite, magnetite, and various platinum groups of elements (PGE) between 2017 and 2018. Currently, various mining companies are involved in mining surveys and operation plans to extract various minerals in Manipur, primarily chromite and limestone in Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal and Chandel districts that borders Myanmar.

The Indigenous Perspectives and Movement for the Sustainable Development of Manipur (IPMSDL) documented that the agreements were made without free, prior, and informed consent, violating international standards like the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Salam Rajesh, an environmental activist, told Land Conflict Watch, "I am aware of this [the mining agreements] but I haven't seen it yet. As far as I am aware, the government had not brought it out for public discussion, nor consulted with local stakeholders."

For instance, in Mailiang village, inhabited by the Tangkhul tribe, the Department of Industries and Commerce set up a store, a workers’ camp with basic machinery to commence limestone mining in an area but the villagers do not have basic information on the mining activity such as Detailed Project Report, Environment Impact Assessments.

Several proposed mining zones overlap with lands inhabited by indigenous communities, who depend on these areas for their livelihoods and cultural practices. The MoUs have triggered fear of forced displacement and loss of ancestral land rights.

Rajesh added, "Chromite mining in Ukhrul district had begun without anyone aware of it initially, but later there was hue and cry and locals opposed it very strongly. Naga insurgents also blocked the mining. It was reported that the chromite was going out from Manipur destined for Odisha but I'm not very sure of about though."

Local communities and organizations, such as the Committee on Protection of Natural Resources in Manipur (CPNRM), have demanded the cancellation of MoUs signed for mining activities without the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples of the state. 

Civil society organizations also expressed deep concerns regarding the lack of public consultations and environmental impact assessments (EIAs) before signing the MoUs. Media reports further highlighted that the mining-affected communities were not informed about the potential consequences of these actions.

While these protests have temporarily halted some mining activities, the government is yet to officially cancel the agreements. Activists continue to demand a dialogue to address community concerns.

Meanwhile, critics accused the government of exploiting ethnic violence to push these contracts, particularly for platinum mining, amid rising tensions between Meitei and Kuki communities. In August 2023, the Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) president Prakash Ambedkar stated that the unrest is being used as a pretext to push mining contracts to private industrialists close to the government. He alleged that significant platinum reserves were uncovered in areas inhabited by the Kuki tribal communities and that the ruling BJP government was using the unrest in Manipur to grant mining rights to Gautam Adani. Land Conflict Watch has not independently verified the veracity of facts in this allegation.

In addition, there are growing worries about the impact of extractive industries and related projects, which have increased militarisation and targeted indigenous leaders under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act, of 1958 (AFSPA). Calls for the repeal of AFSPA and demilitarisation of Manipur have been emphasised.

Activists also warned that mining activities would result in deforestation, soil erosion, water contamination, and biodiversity loss. Jiten Yumnam, a prominent environmentalist, argued that mining operations threaten the fragile ecosystems of Manipur's hill areas.

As of February 2025, the mining activities have been halted. Another environmental activist from the state, on condition of anonymity said, "The mining agreements were initiated in the beginning and the mining companies also came to survey the areas but it was gradually withheld. Manipur comes under 371 (C) governance and without the consent of Hills Areas Committee (HAC) they cannot pursue such explorations. Moreover, tribes in the Ukhrul district like tribe Hoho objected to chromite mining."

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1. To seek Free and Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) of the affected community people. 2. Complete process for identification and settlement of rights under FRA 3. Demand to make records of all consultation and meetings available on a public domain to prove that all formalities have been carried out

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Other environmental services, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Manipur State, Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), DTCI, Manipur, Geological Survey of India (GSI), Department of Industries and Commerce (DIC), Manipur; Ministry of Mines and Minerals, Government of India

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

M/s Sarvesh Refractories Pvt. Ltd, Rourkela, M/s Rourkela Minerals Pvt. Ltd, Rourkela, M/s Kotak Resources, Mumbai, M/s Gulf Natural Resources, Gurgaon, M/s Visa Steel Ltd, Odisha, M/s Manipur Mines and Minerals Pvt. Ltd., M/s Balassore Alloys Ltd, Odisha, M/s Super Ores, Guwahati, M/s Gulf Natural Resources, Gurgaon, and M/s Ramung Enterprises, Imphal, Anand Exports Ltd, Odhisa , Visa Steel Ltd, Odhisa, Balasore Alloys Ltd, Odhisa, Ramung Enterprises, Imphal, and Sukhdev Mining & Industries Private Limited, Madhya Pradesh, Projects funded by World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Japan International Cooperation Agency,

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Kuki and Naga Communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Other environmental services, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us