Assam
Runikhata range
,
Chirang
,
Chirang
Published :
Jun 2024
|
Updated :
Several families evicted for encroachment in Assam's Chirang Reserve Forest
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
55
Households affected
264
People affected
2023
Year started
78
Land area affected
55
Households affected
264
People Affected
2023
Year started
78
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

At least 55 families have been evicted from the Chirang Reserve Forest limits in Assam for illegally encroaching on forest land since January 2023.

In April 2024, forest department officials noticed a large-scale encroachment of forest land and deforestation have taken place in Ultapani, Kokrajhar. Following which, 33 families were evicted from the forest land. In Ultapani alone, forest officials claimed that around 25 bighas have already been illegally encroached by the people.

Similar instances of encroachment and deforestation was reported in in the Sonapur and Laimuthi areas of the Chirang Reserve Forest in Kokrajhar district. Media report suggested that around 250 families have occupied land plots of 15 bighas each in the Lumsung reserve forest near Laopani. These families, from areas like Dhekiajuli, Karbi Anglong, and Baksa, expressed willingness to leave if provided with alternative land.

On 24 September 2023, 25 families in Runikhata range in Assam's Chirang district were evicted for illegally encroaching on forest land. The eviction drive to clear the Chirang Reserve Forest, in the Runikhata range along the Indo-Bhutan border, from encroachment was jointly carried out by the Laukriguri Forest Department and the Assam Police. The officials reclaimed approximately 75 hectares of land that had been encroached upon.

In the Runikhata range, some residents had started cultivating rubber on forest land. Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) B N Patiri told news agency PTI, "These encroachers were mostly from the Bodo community and stayed in nearby villages. They deforested a huge area and started a rubber plantation with the help of two brokers. We have arrested these two culprits."

Several people protested against the eviction and demanded the authorities to stop the eviction. They also claimed that they had received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them in the area.

An official stated, “People from nearby villages have gathered here and destroying the plantation area. We are clearing the area of encroachment through eviction. We will once again begin planting trees. These people have destroyed the tree plantation and have begun rubber plantation. A total of 1 lakh rubber sapling stock is present here. The evicted people have claimed that they have received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them here. The rubber board without the prior permission or NOC from the forest department cannot issue grant or permit people to plant rubber here. Rubber plantation is not a forest activity, only forest plantation can take place here.”

Two persons namely Majen Basumatary from Laukriguri village and Ratan Nazary from Udalguri village, respectively, were detained during the eviction drive. However, no further information is available in public on the detainment of the two people.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department of Laukriguri, Assam Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us