Several families evicted for encroachment in Assam's Chirang Reserve Forest

Reported by

Emilo Yanthan

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

June 17, 2024

June 24, 2024

Edited on

June 17, 2024

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Starting Year

2023

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

78

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

55

People Affected by Conflict

264

State

Assam

Sector

Conservation and Forestry

People Affected by Conflict

264

Households Affected by Conflict

55

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

78

ha

Starting Year

2023

Location of Conflict

Chirang

Runikhata range

Chirang

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)

Land Conflict Summary

At least 55 families have been evicted from the Chirang Reserve Forest limits in Assam for illegally encroaching on forest land since January 2023.

In April 2024, forest department officials noticed a large-scale encroachment of forest land and deforestation have taken place in Ultapani, Kokrajhar. Following which, 33 families were evicted from the forest land. In Ultapani alone, forest officials claimed that around 25 bighas have already been illegally encroached by the people.

Similar instances of encroachment and deforestation was reported in in the Sonapur and Laimuthi areas of the Chirang Reserve Forest in Kokrajhar district. Media report suggested that around 250 families have occupied land plots of 15 bighas each in the Lumsung reserve forest near Laopani. These families, from areas like Dhekiajuli, Karbi Anglong, and Baksa, expressed willingness to leave if provided with alternative land.

On 24 September 2023, 25 families in Runikhata range in Assam's Chirang district were evicted for illegally encroaching on forest land. The eviction drive to clear the Chirang Reserve Forest, in the Runikhata range along the Indo-Bhutan border, from encroachment was jointly carried out by the Laukriguri Forest Department and the Assam Police. The officials reclaimed approximately 75 hectares of land that had been encroached upon.

In the Runikhata range, some residents had started cultivating rubber on forest land. Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) B N Patiri told news agency PTI, "These encroachers were mostly from the Bodo community and stayed in nearby villages. They deforested a huge area and started a rubber plantation with the help of two brokers. We have arrested these two culprits."

Several people protested against the eviction and demanded the authorities to stop the eviction. They also claimed that they had received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them in the area.

An official stated, “People from nearby villages have gathered here and destroying the plantation area. We are clearing the area of encroachment through eviction. We will once again begin planting trees. These people have destroyed the tree plantation and have begun rubber plantation. A total of 1 lakh rubber sapling stock is present here. The evicted people have claimed that they have received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them here. The rubber board without the prior permission or NOC from the forest department cannot issue grant or permit people to plant rubber here. Rubber plantation is not a forest activity, only forest plantation can take place here.”

Two persons namely Majen Basumatary from Laukriguri village and Ratan Nazary from Udalguri village, respectively, were detained during the eviction drive. However, no further information is available in public on the detainment of the two people.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Assam Forest Regulation, 1891
Section 24 [Trespass of forest to be punished by fine or imprisonment], Section 25(f) [Acts prohibited in forest to include clearing up land for cultivation or any other purpose]
Indian Forest Act, 1927
Section 72 [State government may invest any forest office with the power to hold inquiry into forest offences]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Several families lost their land and home.

Date of Violation

September 23, 2023

Location of Violation

Runikhata range under Chirang district

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

Media-based activism/alternative media

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department of Laukriguri, Assam Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

India Today NE

At least 55 families have been evicted from the Chirang Reserve Forest limits in Assam for illegally encroaching on forest land since January 2023.

In April 2024, forest department officials noticed a large-scale encroachment of forest land and deforestation have taken place in Ultapani, Kokrajhar. Following which, 33 families were evicted from the forest land. In Ultapani alone, forest officials claimed that around 25 bighas have already been illegally encroached by the people.

Similar instances of encroachment and deforestation was reported in in the Sonapur and Laimuthi areas of the Chirang Reserve Forest in Kokrajhar district. Media report suggested that around 250 families have occupied land plots of 15 bighas each in the Lumsung reserve forest near Laopani. These families, from areas like Dhekiajuli, Karbi Anglong, and Baksa, expressed willingness to leave if provided with alternative land.

On 24 September 2023, 25 families in Runikhata range in Assam's Chirang district were evicted for illegally encroaching on forest land. The eviction drive to clear the Chirang Reserve Forest, in the Runikhata range along the Indo-Bhutan border, from encroachment was jointly carried out by the Laukriguri Forest Department and the Assam Police. The officials reclaimed approximately 75 hectares of land that had been encroached upon.

In the Runikhata range, some residents had started cultivating rubber on forest land. Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) B N Patiri told news agency PTI, "These encroachers were mostly from the Bodo community and stayed in nearby villages. They deforested a huge area and started a rubber plantation with the help of two brokers. We have arrested these two culprits."

Several people protested against the eviction and demanded the authorities to stop the eviction. They also claimed that they had received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them in the area.

An official stated, “People from nearby villages have gathered here and destroying the plantation area. We are clearing the area of encroachment through eviction. We will once again begin planting trees. These people have destroyed the tree plantation and have begun rubber plantation. A total of 1 lakh rubber sapling stock is present here. The evicted people have claimed that they have received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them here. The rubber board without the prior permission or NOC from the forest department cannot issue grant or permit people to plant rubber here. Rubber plantation is not a forest activity, only forest plantation can take place here.”

Two persons namely Majen Basumatary from Laukriguri village and Ratan Nazary from Udalguri village, respectively, were detained during the eviction drive. However, no further information is available in public on the detainment of the two people.

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Assam Forest Regulation, 1891
Section 24 [Trespass of forest to be punished by fine or imprisonment], Section 25(f) [Acts prohibited in forest to include clearing up land for cultivation or any other purpose]
Indian Forest Act, 1927
Section 72 [State government may invest any forest office with the power to hold inquiry into forest offences]
Sudama Singh v. Deepak Mohan Spolia (C.A. No(s). 21806-21807/2017, Supreme Court)
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing, A/HRC/RES/43/14, dated July 6, 2020
The Guidelines state that the government must provide just compensation and sufficient accommodation to evictees immediately. At a minimum, the government must provide access to basic facilities such as food, water, and shelter, among others.
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Forced evictions/dispossession of land

Non-rehabilitation of displaced people

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

Displacement

Whether criminal law was used against protestors:

No

Reported Details of the Violation:

Several families lost their land and home.

Date of Violation

September 23, 2023

Location of Violation

Runikhata range under Chirang district

Nature of Protest

Media-based activism/alternative media

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department of Laukriguri, Assam Police

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

India Today NE

Documented By

Text Link

Reviewed By

Text Link

Updated By

Text Link

Edited By

Text LinkLand Conflict Watch

Other Land Conflicts in Assam

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now
    Assam
    Runikhata range
    ,
    Chirang
    ,
    Chirang
    Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
    Several families evicted for encroachment in Assam's Chirang Reserve Forest
    Reported by
    Emilo Yanthan
    Legal Review by
    Anmol Gupta
    Updated by
    Anupa Kujur
    55
    Households affected
    264
    People Affected
    2023
    Year started
    78
    Land area affected
    55
    Households affected
    264
    People Affected
    2023
    Year started
    78
    Land area affected
    Key Insights
    Sector
    Conservation and Forestry
    Reason/Cause of conflict
    Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
    Conflict Status
    Ongoing
    Ended
    Legal Status
    Region Classification
    Rural
    Ended
    1
    Summary

    At least 55 families have been evicted from the Chirang Reserve Forest limits in Assam for illegally encroaching on forest land since January 2023.

    In April 2024, forest department officials noticed a large-scale encroachment of forest land and deforestation have taken place in Ultapani, Kokrajhar. Following which, 33 families were evicted from the forest land. In Ultapani alone, forest officials claimed that around 25 bighas have already been illegally encroached by the people.

    Similar instances of encroachment and deforestation was reported in in the Sonapur and Laimuthi areas of the Chirang Reserve Forest in Kokrajhar district. Media report suggested that around 250 families have occupied land plots of 15 bighas each in the Lumsung reserve forest near Laopani. These families, from areas like Dhekiajuli, Karbi Anglong, and Baksa, expressed willingness to leave if provided with alternative land.

    On 24 September 2023, 25 families in Runikhata range in Assam's Chirang district were evicted for illegally encroaching on forest land. The eviction drive to clear the Chirang Reserve Forest, in the Runikhata range along the Indo-Bhutan border, from encroachment was jointly carried out by the Laukriguri Forest Department and the Assam Police. The officials reclaimed approximately 75 hectares of land that had been encroached upon.

    In the Runikhata range, some residents had started cultivating rubber on forest land. Divisional Forest Officer (DFO) B N Patiri told news agency PTI, "These encroachers were mostly from the Bodo community and stayed in nearby villages. They deforested a huge area and started a rubber plantation with the help of two brokers. We have arrested these two culprits."

    Several people protested against the eviction and demanded the authorities to stop the eviction. They also claimed that they had received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them in the area.

    An official stated, “People from nearby villages have gathered here and destroying the plantation area. We are clearing the area of encroachment through eviction. We will once again begin planting trees. These people have destroyed the tree plantation and have begun rubber plantation. A total of 1 lakh rubber sapling stock is present here. The evicted people have claimed that they have received the rubber saplings from the rubber board to plant them here. The rubber board without the prior permission or NOC from the forest department cannot issue grant or permit people to plant rubber here. Rubber plantation is not a forest activity, only forest plantation can take place here.”

    Two persons namely Majen Basumatary from Laukriguri village and Ratan Nazary from Udalguri village, respectively, were detained during the eviction drive. However, no further information is available in public on the detainment of the two people.

    2
    Fact Sheet

    Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

    Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

    Complaint against procedural violations

    Demand for rehabilitation

    Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

    Region Classification

    Rural

    Type of Land

    Common

    Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

    What was the action taken by the police?

    How many people did the police detain or arrest?

    What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

    Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

    If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

    If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

    Legislation under which the accused was charged

    Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

    In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

    Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

    Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

    Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

    Status of Project

    Original Project Deadline

    Whether the Project has been Delayed

    Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

    Residential area, Non-agri rural enterprise

    Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

    Source/Reference

    Total investment involved (in Crores):

    Type of investment:

    Year of Estimation

    Page Number In Investment Document:

    Has the Conflict Ended?

    No

    When did it end?

    Why did the conflict end?

    Emilo Yanthan