Chhattisgarh
Narayanpur
,
Matla Reserve Forest
,
Kanker
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Tribal Communities Oppose Rowghat Iron Ore Mine in Chhattisgarh to Protect Forestland
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
700
People affected
2009
Year started
2029
Land area affected
Households affected
700
People Affected
2009
Year started
2029
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Chhattisgarh, tribal communities and activists have opposed the Rowghat Iron Ore Mine project in Matla Reserve Forest in Narayanpur and Kanker districts. They fear mining may have an adverse impact on the forestland and the region's flora and fauna and also disrupt their cultural and religious practices. 
The project, purposed for Bhilai Steel Plant (BSP), is over three decades old. In June 2009, the project received environmental clearance for 2,028.797 hectares of forestland. However, it got the Stage-II forest clearance for only 883.22 hectares. According to the 2006 Rapid Environment Impact Assessment report, the project would displace households from at least 35 villages and lead to massive deforestation. 
The public agitation fuelled after the process for constructing the 235-kilometre-long Dalli - Rajhara - Rowghat - Jagdalpur railway line began. 
In response to the public protests, the administration heavily militarised the region to curb resistance. Reportedly, BSP funds many of these security camps. The local people have reported many instances of harassment, arrests and intimidation. There have also been reports of Naxalite-led opposition to the project.  
In January 2014, Badri Gawde, a local social worker and political activist from the region, founded the Rowghat Bachao Sangharsh Samiti. However, soon after the protests gained momentum, he was arrested and allegedly falsely charged under the Public Security Act for aiding Naxalites. A 2016 news article reported that the next leader of the Samiti was imprisoned as well. 
In February 2014, Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan (CBA) released a statement to raise objections against the project and highlighted the procedural violations in its execution. The CBA provided evidence to claim the violation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA), Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, and Forest Conservation Act. The organisation raised questions over the 1,145 hetares of dense forestland left out from the purview of the forest clearance lease, which gave the company liberty to exploit the forestland. Based on a field survey, the CBA also reported discrepancies in the No Objection Certificates acquired from the affected Gram Sabhas and claimed that many of the affected villages lacked prior knowledge of the project. 
Meanwhile, some of the affected communities attempted to file Community Forest Rights claims with the support of an NGO. However, in 2015, the sub-divisional magistrate reportedly cancelled these claims. Following this, the state government took over the filing of claims. In many cases, the rights are yet to be settled or have discrepancies. In the same year, the Rowghat mine became operational. 
According to a media report, the communities also filed a petition to object the mining activities citing the religious significance of Rowghat for the Gond tribe. The petition challenged the forest clearance granted to the project without the settlement of FRA claims. The case is ongoing in the Chhattisgarh high court. 
In 2017, SAIL signed a contract with two private companies to develop the mine for 30 years. In June, the environment ministry approved an amendment to the environmental clearance to transport the iron ore through a road corridor until 2021 to accommodate the delay in constructing the railway line. This was met with strong opposition from the affected villagers who were agitated by the possibilities of the rise in pollution, procedural violations and the lack of compensation. In 2020, a newspaper reported that the company would soon start “interim mining” in the region. 
In February 2021, a resident of Madpa village challenged the amendment permitting the interim road corridor. However, the court quickly dismissed the petition citing adverse economic consequences of hindering a mining project of national significance. 
In May 2021, 12 affected Gram Sabhas in Antagarh block submitted a memorandum to the district collector to complain against the delay in the implementation of welfare schemes by BSP. 
Currently, the project work is ongoing with support from the government. Meanwhile, there has been no progress in the settlement of rights claims or compensation. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2500

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

1980

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

National Mineral Development Corporation, Bhilai Steel Plant

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Steel Authority of India Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Madia Gonds, Abuj Madia and Madia tribal communities

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us