Rajasthan
Nagnechinagar
,
Ugras
,
Jodhpur
Published :
Mar 2022
|
Updated :
Rajasthan HC Dismisses Petition to Cancel Land Allotment for Solar Plant in Jodhpur
Reported by
Kuber Bathla
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2018
Year started
331
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2018
Year started
331
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Ugras and Nagnechinagar villages in Jodhpur district had been opposing a solar power plant by Essel Saurya Urja Company of Rajasthan Limited (ESUCRL), a joint venture of the state and IL&FS Energy Development Company Limited. The plant is proposed over 331.1 hectares of land in Ugras, listed in government records as ‘barren’ or ‘wasteland’. The solar plant is expected to generate 750 megawatt of power.

The proposed land is home to dhanis (a cluster of houses in the middle of a field), which the residents claimed were built 40-45 years ago, and is also used to cultivate crops. They claimed that they were not informed about the land allocation to ESUCRL and that they had complete rights over the land. According to them, the land in question includes water tanks, hills, oran, rivers, schools, temple and residential houses and, thus, is used by the community.

In 2018, the residents protested outside the sub-division office in Phalodi, Jodhpur, and demanded that the project be stopped. They also submitted a memorandum. The same year, they filed a case in the High Court of Rajasthan for cancellation of land allotment of 331 hectares in Ugras, but the court dismissed the petition, citing lack of adequate evidence to ascertain whether the said land was being used for public utilities or not. The court had ordered a survey to determine this, but there was no official update on whether the survey was conducted.

One of the petitioners informed LCW that they did not wish to pursue the matter after the court's verdict.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

452

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

6

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

June 29, 2021

Why did the conflict end?

Court decision not in favour of community

In Ugras village in Jodhpur, the residents had demanded that the land allotted to Essel Saurya Urja Limited be cancelled on the grounds that the land is being used for public utility. However, the demand was rejected both by a single-judge bench of the Rajasthan high court as well as a division bench of the court, citing lack of adequate evidence to ascertain whether the said land was being used for public utilities or not. After the court order, the petitioners did not pursue the matter further.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Collector of Jodhpur, Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Energy Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

LCW did not receive any response despite multiple emails and calls to the office of the company.

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Essel Saurya Urja Company of Rajasthan Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Kuber Bathla

Kuber is a second-year student of Political Science and Economics at St. Stephen's College, University of Delhi, with interests in public policy, rural development, political analysis and organisation management. He is currently interning with the Observer Research Foundation. In the past, he has worked with Transform Rural India Foundation (an initiative of Tata Trusts) and India Development Review, learning research, data and organisation management.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us