Uttarakhand
Banbhoolpura area, including Dholak Basti, Nayi Basti and Gafur Basti
,
Haldwani
,
Nainital
Published :
Feb 2022
|
Updated :
January 4, 2023
Railways Serve Eviction Notice to over 4,000 in Uttarakhand's Nainital Citing Encroachment
Reported by
Urvashi Mahtolia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
4365
Households affected
20952
People affected
2007
Year started
12
Land area affected
4365
Households affected
20952
People Affected
2007
Year started
12
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Railways
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On July 27, 2021, the North Eastern Railways served more than 1,000 eviction notices to the residents of Banbhoolpura, ordering them to evict their houses within 15 days. Similar notices were served to more than 500 people in April and 1,581 people in January. The residents complained that the regular circulation of eviction notices was only to harass the people as the matter is sub judice in court. 

In an earlier order dated November 9, 2016, the Uttarakhand high court had directed the North Eastern Railway authorities to remove encroachments on railway land. Following that order, around 4,365 notices were issued in 2016**. **Dismissing a review application filed by the state, the court in January 2017 ordered the eviction of encroachers within four weeks. But the Supreme Court stayed the order for three months, noting that the high court had not heard the petitioners before passing the order of eviction.

Families facing the threat of eviction contend that the land belongs to the Haldwani Municipal Corporation (HMC) and not the Railways. Some have claimed long-standing possession, arguing that they have been residing in the area since independence and hence the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, does not apply to them. Others have claimed that the land was allotted to them by the state, while some others contend that they purchased the land in a public auction. The counsel for people facing the eviction claim a land ownership dispute between the Railways and the state, in addition to the demarcation of the land not being complete.

Laxmi, one of the women living in the area facing the threat of eviction, told LCW: "Our houses have been marked. I know they have been asking us to relocate. When Indira aunty (referring to late Congress leader Indira Hridayesh of Haldwani constituency) was around, she told us not to worry. But I am not sure what awaits us now; nobody anyway listens to us.”

The residents have been demanding ownership rights, regularisation, construction of sewer lines, hospitals and resettlement of people in the Gafur Basti area. According to them, the HMC owns 75 per cent of the land and hence, the demarcation should be done jointly by the corporation and the Railways. They also argue that the Railways should only evict people residing in its part of the land.

Railway officials, meanwhile, say that the encroachment is hampering development and expansion works. According to them, several proposals for expanding railway tracks in the area were sent to the government in the past but that the issue of encroachment prevented their passage. A proposal for constructing pit lines was sent a few years ago but has taken a backseat due to the lack of space resulting from encroachment. Officials believe that removing the encroachment would facilitate the operation of longer route trains from the Haldwani railway station, which will benefit the Railways with increased income and enable more accessible travel for the general public.

In 2018, the High Court had issued directions to the HMC to remove all illegal encroachments in the city after a public interest litigation was filed by a journalist. The same year, the state passed the Uttarakhand Special Provisions for Urban Bodies and Authorities Act, which provided a three-year relief to unauthorised constructions (slums) from punitive actions in matters of notices issued by a local authority. Replacing a 2016 Act by the previous government, the 2018 Act is aimed at sustainable and planned development of slums in the state.

The conflict over the encroachment of Railway land can be traced to 2007, when the Railway authorities conducted eviction drives for land demarcation and removal of encroachment. However, it resulted in clashes and arson and was met with protests and stone-pelting. As the railways authorities continue to issue notices, the fate of thousands of people has been left in the lurch. Agitating people have questioned the government’s intentions, as they claim no action has been taken since 2016 to regularise the land or to resettle them.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Regularisation of land, construction of sewer lines and hospitals

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Indian Railways

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Banbhoolpura Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Urvashi Mahtolia

Urvashi graduated with a Master’s degree in Environment and Development from the School of Human Ecology, Ambedkar University Delhi, in 2021. She is currently working as a research consultant with the National Social Expertise team on an International Finance Corporation-funded project on Cumulative Impact Assessment of Renewable Energy Projects. She is an interdisciplinary researcher interested in land and forest governance and is keen to learn more about the domain of public policy and issues of displacement and resettlement.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for rehabilitation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us