Assam
,
Sonapur
,
Kamrup
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
Protests erupt in Assam's Sonapur over proposed cement plant
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2024
Year started
8
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2024
Year started
8
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On 10 June 2024, Sonapur in Assam witnessed widespread protest during a public hearing organised by the Assam Pollution Control Board on a proposed cement plant by Taj Cement. Residents and local organisations vehemently opposed the factory, alleging procedural lapses including inadequate public notification and advertising.

Locals said that the proposed factory, which would produce 10 lakh units a year, could cause severe pollution, environmental damage and pose health risks.

Before the hearing, a crowd surrounded officials from the Taj Cement, criticising the lack of announcements on information regarding the Rs 342-crore project. As the situation worsened, police and CRPF forces were called in to manage the unrest. According to a media report, protesters and security personnel engaged in violent altercations. However, there are no details of the number of persons injured.

Locals demanded a reassessment of the impact of the project on the environment since the project site is close to the Air Force station in Digaru and the Amchang and Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuaries. While a few people supported the factory for new job opportunities, many opposed it.

The Additional District Commissioner commented, "Many organizations have submitted memorandums, and each will be reported. Those involved in the violence will face the law."

Meanwhile, villagers near the proposed Taj Cement plant in Sonapur, filed a complaint with the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) claiming that the State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) Assam violated procedures, especially concerning the timing and transparency, during the public hearing on June 10, 2024.

Baten Ali, a petitioner from Kapalkata village, stated, “The public hearing was conducted 106 days after Taj Cement’s application. The EIA Notification 2006 clearly states a 45-day limit. Such delays cast doubt on the fairness of the entire environmental assessment process.”

Another petitioner, Rakesh Hazarika, said, “This is a clear lapse in ensuring transparency and access to crucial information. The public cannot provide informed feedback if they don’t have access to the Draft EIA document locally.”

In its order, the NGT directed the SEIAA to cancel the public hearing dated 10/06/2024 and engage in other agencies to hold a fresh public hearing as per the procedure laid down in the EIA Notification, 2006.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1. Demand to quash the public hearing held on 10/06/2024 2. to engage other agency or authority other than the Assam State Pollution Board to complete the public hearing process as per the procedure laid down in EIA Notification,2006.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

342

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2024

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administration, Police and CRPF forces, Pollution Control Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

M/S Taj Cement Manufacturing Pvt Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us