In 2016, the Joint Forest Management Committee (JFMC) of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, in collusion with the state forest department, allegedly destroyed crops and fenced agricultural land in Nagadabra village located in Pandariya block. The forest department also took away grazing animals of the farmers and returned them only after being bribed. From 2017 to 2019, multiple incidents of violence took place in Nagadabra when the police teamed up with the forest and revenue departments and destroyed houses and beat up people. The authorities claim that the Nagadabra residents have settled on land for which they do not have title deeds. The residents, on the other hand, refute this allegation. Faglu Baiga, the village head and one of the first persons to migrate from the hills to settle in Nagadabra, showed LCW his land deeds/patta to prove his ownership. However, he adds that the situation is complicated as the people have been given land deeds for plots adjacent to the land where they reside, creating confusion over ownership. Violence also broke out in the new hamlet of Tandidahra adjacent to Nagadabra. After the monsoons in 2016, about 75 families from the Baiga community settled in Tandidahra after receiving written permission from the sub divisional magistrate, hoping to eventually get title deeds for the land. This settlement was also attacked thrice from 2017 to 2019 by the JFMC of Kodwagodan and Mathpur panchayats, forest department, revenue department and the police. The residents were assaulted, newly made huts were burnt, water sources were destroyed, land was bulldozed and agricultural equipment and mobile phones were confiscated. In July 2018, the villagers were evicted the authorities forcefully corralled them and their cattle into trucks and dropped them off in a faraway village. At least 150 households (75 each in Nagadabra and Tandidahra) have been affected by the crackdown by the administration. Almost all of these families are from the Baiga tribe, listed as PVTG (particularly vulnerable tribal group). When the villagers and local activists protested against the violence, they were assaulted and beaten up by the police. Various complaints were also lodged at the block, district and state levels over the years. But no significant action has been taken, except for a report sent by the State SC/ST Commission in 2017 to various district authorities after conducting an inquiry, in which it asked the district authorities to resolve the issue after discussing with the communities and to provide land to the families instead of evicting them. The protesters too have demanded a stop to the violence by the forest, revenue and police departments, resolution of confusion over _pattas _for adjacent plots of land in Nagadabra and resettlement of the 75 families from Tandidahra. They have not taken any legal recourse yet. On September 17, 2020, the state authorities again destroyed standing crops grown by farmers in Nagadabra and let animals loose on the fields. The villagers submitted written complaints to the district collector, police and the forest department. "We grow crops in the hope that we will earn our own food and yet they are destroyed," one of the residents told LCW. They are now trying to file a public interest litigation at the Chhattisgarh high court. Meanwhile, the households that were trying to settle in Tandidahra have moved back to their native villages of Birhuldeeh, Fifdi and Karhalu in the hills, to name a few, for fear of violence by state authorities and neighbouring panchayats, although they have not abandoned their claim on the land.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for legal recognition of land rights
Demand for promised land
Complaint against procedural violations
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Rural
Type of Land
Both
Forest and Non-Forest
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Constitutional Law, Forest and Scheduled Area Governance Laws, Other
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Forced evictions/dispossession of land
Land record discrepancies
Non-implementation/violation of FRA
Non-rehabilitation of displaced people
Lack of legal protection over land rights
Legal Status:
Out of Court
Status of Case In Court
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Yes
Name of the adjudicatory body
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Case Number
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Displacement
Torching of houses
Other harassment
Physical attack
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Reported Details of the Violation:
From 2017 to 2019, the police, along with the forest department, evicted more than 70 Baiga families. They burnt houses, bulldozed land, confisctated mobile phones and assaulted the tribe members when they protested.
Date of Violation
Location of Violation
Nagadabra, Tandidahra
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Forest Department, Revenue Department
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
No
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?