Gujarat
,
Talaja
,
Bhavnagar
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
PIL against windmill park near Gir forest in Gujarat
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
18
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
18
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Renewable Power
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Gujarat High Court on 5 May 2017 issued notice to the state government on a fresh public interest litigation (PIL) against a windmill park, which is allegedly being constructed close to a reserve forest in Talaja Range.

Manish Bharti Goswami, a Bhavnagar resident and president of the Lion Nature Youth Foundation, submitted the PIL, raising concerns about the potential impact on the lion habitat. The petition alleged that Veer Energy & Infrastructure Limited, an Ahmedabad-based company, was constructing 27 large windmills close to the reserve forest, a crucial habitat for Asiatic lions and other wildlife.

According to the petitioner, the company had received permission in July 2012 to construct the windmill park on 18 hectares of land, with the condition that they maintain a distance of 1.5 km from the reserve forest. However, the windmills were allegedly set up only 200 metres away, leading to a halt in the work. The PIL further alleged that the Chief Forest Conservator in Gandhinagar, in a letter dated 21 December 2016, told the Forest Conservator in Junagadh that the distance between the windmill and the reserved forest should be only 50 m.

“The construction of 27 windmills in this area would be detrimental to the existence of lions and other wildlife in the corridors of the last surviving Asiatic lions in the world,” Anand Yagnik, counsel for the petitioner, was quoted as saying. The plea underscored that the wind farm's construction and the movement of heavy vehicles would cause irreparable damage to wildlife, including Asiatic lions and various bird species.

It is alleged that the land allocated for the windmill project was government wasteland, surrounded by grazing land in some areas. The plea referenced data indicating that 25 Asiatic lions and 121 leopards had died due to unnatural causes, with electrocution being a significant factor. The presence of transformers in the area posed an imminent danger to the wildlife.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel

Gujarat

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Gujarat
Gujarat

Amid protest, Gujarat scraps Par-Tapi-Narmada river-linking project

Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh

Protests by Kinnauri tribes halt hydro electric project in Himachal Pradesh

Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu

Villagers oppose greenfield airport for Chennai in Parandur, Tamil Nadu

Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh

Landowners affected by Renukaji dam project await fair compensation

Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh

Hydroelectric projects on Subansiri river continue despite public outcry, disasters, and persistent floods

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers divided over Mandal-Becharaji Special Investment region in Gujarat

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Goa
Goa

Proposed construction in Goa village blocks residents' access to agricultural fields, river

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

PIL against windmill park near Gir forest in Gujarat

Reported by

Suchak Patel

Legal Review by

Sourabh Rai, Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

August 8, 2024

August 9, 2024

Edited on

August 8, 2024

Sector

Power

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Renewable Power

Starting Year

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

18

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

State

Gujarat

Sector

Power

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

18

ha

Starting Year

Location of Conflict

Talaja

Bhavnagar

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Renewable Power

Land Conflict Summary

The Gujarat High Court on 5 May 2017 issued notice to the state government on a fresh public interest litigation (PIL) against a windmill park, which is allegedly being constructed close to a reserve forest in Talaja Range.

Manish Bharti Goswami, a Bhavnagar resident and president of the Lion Nature Youth Foundation, submitted the PIL, raising concerns about the potential impact on the lion habitat. The petition alleged that Veer Energy & Infrastructure Limited, an Ahmedabad-based company, was constructing 27 large windmills close to the reserve forest, a crucial habitat for Asiatic lions and other wildlife.

According to the petitioner, the company had received permission in July 2012 to construct the windmill park on 18 hectares of land, with the condition that they maintain a distance of 1.5 km from the reserve forest. However, the windmills were allegedly set up only 200 metres away, leading to a halt in the work. The PIL further alleged that the Chief Forest Conservator in Gandhinagar, in a letter dated 21 December 2016, told the Forest Conservator in Junagadh that the distance between the windmill and the reserved forest should be only 50 m.

“The construction of 27 windmills in this area would be detrimental to the existence of lions and other wildlife in the corridors of the last surviving Asiatic lions in the world,” Anand Yagnik, counsel for the petitioner, was quoted as saying. The plea underscored that the wind farm's construction and the movement of heavy vehicles would cause irreparable damage to wildlife, including Asiatic lions and various bird species.

It is alleged that the land allocated for the windmill project was government wasteland, surrounded by grazing land in some areas. The plea referenced data indicating that 25 Asiatic lions and 121 leopards had died due to unnatural causes, with electrocution being a significant factor. The presence of transformers in the area posed an imminent danger to the wildlife.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Type of Common Land

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
Section 2 [Restriction on diverting forest land for non-forest purposes without clearance from the union government]
Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972
Section 5C [Functions of the National Board of Wildlife (NBWL) include carrying out impact assessment of any development activity which can impact wildlife or its habitat] Section 29 [Permit granted by Chief Wildlife Warden is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a sanctuary] Section 35(6) [Permit of the NBWL is necessary for any action which may affect or destroy habitats for wildlife in a national park]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

No

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Violation of environmental laws

Legal Status:

In Court

Status of Case In Court

Pending

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Gujarat High Court

Case Number

WRIT PETITION (PIL) - No. 114 of 2017

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

The Public Interest Litigation Writ was filed in Gujarat High Court in 2017. The matter was first heard in May 2017 and notice was issued. The matter came up a few times since then but has not been heard substantively. There is currently no information about the next date of hearing.

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

No items found.

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

No items found.

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Other Land Conflicts in Gujarat

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now