Himachal Pradesh
Kullu and Mandi
,
,
Bilaspur
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Farmers Affected by Parbati-Koldam-Ludhiana Transmission Line Demand Fair Compensation
Reported by
Bimla Vishwapremi
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
5000
People affected
2012
Year started
231
Land area affected
Households affected
5000
People Affected
2012
Year started
231
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Transmission Lines
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Transmission Lines
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The villagers in the Bilaspur, Mandi and Kullu districts of Himachal Pradesh have demanded compensation for the land acquired for constructing the ParbatiKoldamLudhiana Transmission Line project. The 153kilometre long highvoltage transmission line was completed in 2014 by Parbati Koldam Transmission Corporation Limited, a collaboration of Reliance Infrastructure Limited and Power Grid Corporation Of India Limited.  In February 2015, villagers in the Bilaspur district collected under the banner of Himachal Kisan Sabha to protest against the states inaction. According to a news report, the project has affected over 3,000 villagers in the Bilaspur district alone. The villagers allege that the company did not take the requisite permissions. They registered a police complaint against the illegal felling of trees and planned to appeal in the state High Court.  Earlier that year, the factfinding report of the district administration revealed irregularities in the land acquisition process. Based on this, the Deputy Commissioner of Bilaspur directed action against the company for failing to compensate the affected persons in accordance with the parameters of revenue, horticulture, agriculture, and forest departments. He also sought action against the company for violating the Electricity Act, 2003 and the Indian Telegraph Act, 1985. Subsequently, the High Court had ordered three FIRs against the company under sections of the Indian Penal Code, Indian Forest Act, and the Environment Protection Act.  In January 2016, Parbati Koldam Transmission Line Displaced and Affected Farmers Action Committee, and NGO Save Mount organised a press conference. They stated that the complete information about the project, its costs, impact on livelihood and environment, and the compensation were not disclosed to the farmers affected. They also demanded a highlevel inquiry into the role of the officials involved in the project. Earlier in the month, an FIR was filed against the company and the officials for flouting several legal norms resulting in losses for the local farmers.  In May 2019, the Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled to uphold the courtordered FIRs filed against the company.  In January 2021, farmers protested in Jukhala village of Bilaspur district. They voiced their demands for fair compensation in protests that lasted for over two weeks. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1006.53

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest department, Revenue Department, Department of Horticulture

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Reliance Infrastructure Limited, Parbati Koldam Transmission Company Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Save Mountain NGO, Punjab, Himachal Kisan Sabha, Himachal Pradesh Resettled and Affected Samiti, Parbati Koldam Transmission Line Displaced and Affected Farmers Action Committee

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Bimla Vishwapremi
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2024

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us