Tamil Nadu
,
Kundah Taluk
,
Nilgiris
Published :
Aug 2024
|
Updated :
Nilgiris residents protest against Sillahalla hydroelectric project, raise concerns over loss of farmlands
Reported by
Nayantara Lakshman
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2083
Households affected
10000
People affected
2020
Year started
315
Land area affected
2083
Households affected
10000
People Affected
2020
Year started
315
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Environmentalists and local communities have opposed the Sillahalla Pumped Storage Hydro-Electric Project (SPSHEP) proposed in the Kundah Taluk of the Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve by the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO). They say that the project will be an environmental and livelihood disaster as it would submerge acres of dense forests and prime agricultural lands, along with displacing over 10,000 people.
After the Tamil Nadu government's announcement about the Sillahalla hydroelectric project, a group of environment enthusiasts sent online petitions to the expert appraisal committee (EAC) of Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) seeking to reconsider the terms of reference (TOR) clearance for the project. They said that the government failed to acknowledge environmental and livelihood concerns.
Furthermore, in July 2020, a group of 374 conservationists, scientists, people’s groups, members of Non-Governmental Organizations and the public together signed an appeal to the government to scrap the proposed Sillahalla hydroelectric project.
Meanwhile, thousands of farmers from over 15 villages, including Kallakorai, Bembatti, Thulithalai, Kanneri, Thangadu, Oranalli, Meekeri, Muthorai Palada and Balocola, fear that their agricultural lands will be submerged due to the project. Experts say that over 10,000 people from the community, mainly farmers, will lose their livelihoods.
According to the environment clearance report of the project, about 170 hectares of private, forest, and government land will be submerged once the reservoirs turn fully functional. The total land proposed to be acquired for the project is 315 hectares, of which about 180.3 hectares is forest/government land and 134.7 hectares is private land that is proposed to be acquired.
This project involves the construction of two reservoirs, an upper one in Bembatty village along the Sillahalla stream and a lower one downstream past the existing Kundah Dam. A 2.8-km head race and a 1.56 km-long tail race tunnel will connect the two dams. Electricity generation will occur by pumping water from the lower dam to the upper dam. Additionally, the project aims to interconnect these dams with the nearby Avalanche-Emerald Reservoir, which is at the same level. The project includes the construction of a surface storage point and an underground powerhouse.
While the project aims to address the state's power deficiency issue by adding 1,000MW to the power grid for use during peak hours, the region where the project is being proposed is ecologically fragile and prone to annual floods and landslides.
Environmentalists say the Sillahalla hydroelectric project area is adjacent to the Silent Valley National Park, the Mukurthi National Park, and the Nilgiri forest division, making it a region of unique biodiversity and rich ecosensitive zone.
During an online meeting held on 29 July 2023 between the EAC of the MoEF&CC and the Tamil Nadu officials over the issuance of TOR to the project proponent, the former took note of the representation by ecologists, scientists and the NGOs of Nilgiris. The EAC asked for further points to the TOR, including clearance from the National Board of Wildlife; study of the proposed project on the nearby wildlife sanctuary and include conservation plan/mitigation measures in the environment impact assessment and the environment management plan; and an assessment of an environmental cost-benefit analysis.
J Innocent Divya, the district collector of the Nilgiris, told Mongabay India that the implementation of the project would be undertaken only after the environmental impact study and consultations approved by the union ministry. 
Since November 2020 there has been not much news regarding the project and developments on ground. However, C Ramesh, Executive Engineer, Civil-Project Investigation TNEB, TANGEDCO, Emerald, Ooty, told LCW that the project has been stalled mainly because of technical issues. 
Amid protest, TANGEDCO has also tweaked its target for land acquisition. Ramesh explained that the original plan was to go with 2250 MCF storage in Kanneri village. But this required acquisition 1,500 acres of revenue, forest and patta land. That is why the plan was changed to reduce the height of the dam (1 TNC storage capacity) by having a minimum storage based on whatever is required for power generation per day. So now, the plan is to acquire 700 acres in the upper dam, but TANGEDCO is in the process of trying to reduce the need for land further as it is all patta land. 
Meanwhile, the Geological Survey of India has instructed the company to go for a drifting tunnel for this new plant to have more accuracy in the technical points, he added. 
Ramesh further said that all the surveys required to get permission to build the drifting tunnel have been completed and the slip is with the Collector and they are in the liaison work to get permission from the Collector. Based on prior field work, the company has sent all details to various departments and is waiting for the reports to submit to the Collector. Once this permission has been granted, there will be a public consultation with unions and patta landowners.He added that this project is important to meet Tamil Nadu's peak energy requirements. Right now, the government is at loss as they are borrowing energy from private players.
The project is anticipated to become operational in the year 2025.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2025

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

Amid protest, TANGEDCO has tweaked its target for land acquisition, an official, however, maintained that the project has been stalled mainly because of technical issues.  C Ramesh, Executive Engineer, Civil-Project Investigation TNEB, TANGEDCO, Emerald, Ooty, told LCW that the original plan was to go with 2250 MCF storage in Kanneri village. But this required acquisition 1,500 acres of revenue, forest and patta land. That is why the plan was changed to reduce the height of the dam (1 TNC storage capacity) by having a minimum storage based on whatever is required for power generation per day. So now, the plan is to acquire 700 acres in the upper dam, but TANGEDCO is in the process of trying to reduce the need for land further as it is all patta land.  Meanwhile, the Geological Survey of India has instructed the company to go for a drifting tunnel for this new plant to have more accuracy in the technical points, he added.  Ramesh further said that all the surveys required to get permission to build the drifting tunnel have been completed and the slip is with the Collector and they are in the liaison work to get permission from the Collector. Based on prior field work, the company has sent all details to various departments and is waiting for the reports to submit to the Collector. Once this permission has been granted, there will be a public consultation with unions and patta landowners.He added that this project is important to meet Tamil Nadu's peak energy requirements. Right now, the government is at loss as they are borrowing energy from private players.

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4172.62

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

There has been no news about the project since November 2020. However, according to GlobalData, an organisation that monitors and profiles more than 170,000 power plants globally, the project is currently in the permitting phase and it will be executed in several stages. The project is anticipated to become operational in the year 2025.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Nayantara Lakshman

Nayantara is a developmental practitioner, researcher, and journalist who works in the field of community conservation. Her interest lies in understanding how traditional knowledge systems can be integrated into current developmental policies and practices to ensure the future sustenance of forest communities, coastal communities, agricultural communities, and pastoralists- and their role in safeguarding the ecosystems they depend on.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2025

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

Amid protest, TANGEDCO has tweaked its target for land acquisition, an official, however, maintained that the project has been stalled mainly because of technical issues.  C Ramesh, Executive Engineer, Civil-Project Investigation TNEB, TANGEDCO, Emerald, Ooty, told LCW that the original plan was to go with 2250 MCF storage in Kanneri village. But this required acquisition 1,500 acres of revenue, forest and patta land. That is why the plan was changed to reduce the height of the dam (1 TNC storage capacity) by having a minimum storage based on whatever is required for power generation per day. So now, the plan is to acquire 700 acres in the upper dam, but TANGEDCO is in the process of trying to reduce the need for land further as it is all patta land.  Meanwhile, the Geological Survey of India has instructed the company to go for a drifting tunnel for this new plant to have more accuracy in the technical points, he added.  Ramesh further said that all the surveys required to get permission to build the drifting tunnel have been completed and the slip is with the Collector and they are in the liaison work to get permission from the Collector. Based on prior field work, the company has sent all details to various departments and is waiting for the reports to submit to the Collector. Once this permission has been granted, there will be a public consultation with unions and patta landowners.He added that this project is important to meet Tamil Nadu's peak energy requirements. Right now, the government is at loss as they are borrowing energy from private players.

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us