Tamil Nadu
,
Pottipuram
,
Theni
Published :
Aug 2018
|
Updated :
January 21, 2025
Neutrino observatory in Tamil Nadu falls in tiger corridor, government files affidavit against project
Reported by
Hariprasad Radhakrishnan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
2371
Households affected
9249
People affected
2002
Year started
31
ha.
Land area affected
2371
Households affected
9249
People Affected
2002
Year started
31
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Infrastructure
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Infrastructure
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Nearly two decades after it was proposed, the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) project — the most expensive basic science experiment proposed in the country at an estimated cost of Rs 1,500 crore — is yet to take off. The project had received environmental clearance in March 2018.

After overcoming a series of litigations, the INO project seemed to have overcome its hurdles in December 2020 when the Union government notified an area of zero to one kilometre around the boundary of the Mathikettan Shola National Park in Kerala as an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ), effectively placing the INO project site at Pottipuram panchayat in Tamil Nadu’s Theni district outside the ESZ. The national park is located near the Tamil Nadu-Kerala border.

But the project has now met with another bottleneck. During a meeting on 17 February 2021, the Tamil Nadu forest department reportedly informed the Department of Atomic Energy, the funding agency, that the project site falls in the Mathikettan-Periyar tiger corridor. The Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, the project proponent and one among the consortium of 21 institutes involved in the project, was then required to apply for wildlife clearance, which is yet to be examined by the State Board for Wild Life.

Speaking to LCW, Chief Wildlife Warden Shekhar Kumar Niraj confirmed that the project site falls in the tiger corridor. “This brings the state and national boards for wildlife into the picture. Based on their recommendations and the existing laws and policies, the environment ministry will decide on the future course of action.”

Meanwhile, INO Project Director Gobinda Majumder, in a press release, said that the project would not affect the tiger corridor as the tunnel would be constructed several metres underground. “The surface facilities are purely restricted to the 26.82 hectares of revenue land, and they lie completely outside the adjoining reserve forest. Of the 4.62 hectares of underground construction, it is clarified that the tunnel entrance (portal) begins in the revenue land and the horizontal tunnel gets several metres deep before it enters the forest land,” he explained. 

D. Indumathi of the Institute of Mathematical Sciences, who is also a member of the INO Scientific Management Board, told LCW that “not even an inch of the tiger corridor would be occupied” as the portal to enter the tunnel would start well outside the corridor on government land. 

Meanwhile, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin, who has always opposed the project, submitted a memorandum to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on 17 June 2021, listing a number of demands, including the scrapping of the project. Earlier in 2019, the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK), an alliance partner of the ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, had launched a campaign against the project. Stalin, who was then the Leader of Opposition, had flagged off a protest rally of the MDMK.

The residents of Pottipuram panchayat have expressed fear that they would be alienated from the pastoral lands and Ambarappar hill, which they consider their deity. They have also raised concerns about the project utilising 3.5 lakh litres of water per day from the Mullaperiyar Dam and fear "radiation leaks" from neutrinos. Responding to the grievances, Dr. Indumathi had said that the rights of the community outside the fenced land would not be taken away. “The water required for the project accounts for just 0.00002 per cent of the annual flow of the Mullaperiyar river, which is equivalent to the demand of 150 families,” she further told LCW.

On 17 February 2022, the state government filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court stating that it would not permit the construction of the INO project in the state as it would cause irreparable damage to the environment in the Western Ghats. The Supreme Court has been hearing an appeal against the National Green Tribunal's decision to uphold the environmental clearance granted to the project.

Responding to the affidavit, petitioner and environmental activist G. Sundarrajan told LCW that the Supreme Court should pass 'suitable orders' based on the affidavit. Despite the state government's opposition to the project, the National Tiger Conservation Authority had issued a no-objection certificate to the project in March 2021. According to Sundarrajan, the NOC has become invalid after the affidavit.  

In March 2022, Chief Minister M K Stalin appealed for the second time to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to reconsider and shelve the project, citing significant environmental and community concerns.

The INO project continues to face opposition from Tamil Nadu’s state government and local communities. The project’s location in the Western Ghats, a UNESCO World Heritage site and one of India’s most critical biodiversity hotspots, has raised concerns about deforestation, groundwater depletion, and the displacement of local communities, particularly tribal populations who rely on the region’s resources.

Environmentalists and activists argue that the ecological costs of tunnelling and building in such a fragile region could have lasting consequences. CM Stalin’s renewed request reflects the growing pressure from both activists and local residents, who argue that the scientific gains do not justify the potential environmental damage.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2015

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/tamil-nadu-says-no-to-indian-neutrino-observatory-project-in-theni-81604>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

1500

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2002

Page Number In Investment Document:

18

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

NA

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Department of Atomic Energy, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Department of Science and Technology

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Aligarh Muslim University, Banaras Hindu University, Central University of Karnataka, Delhi University, Harish Chandra Research Institute, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Institute of Physics, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Jammu University, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Lucknow University, Panjab University, Physical Research Laboratory, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Tezpur University, University of Calcutta, University of Calicut, University of Hyderabad, University of Kashmir, University of Mysore, Utkal University, Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Poovulagin Nanbargal

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Hariprasad Radhakrishnan

Hariprasad is a Tamil Nadu-based independent journalist who writes primarily on environmental and developmental issues. He has worked for and contributed to a number of leading publications. He can often be seen playing chess or struggling to learn the keyboard.

Show more work
Latest updates
Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat farmers oppose land acquisition for Kodinar-Somnath railway project

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Dima Hasao
Assam

Environmental Devastation and Human Fatalities: The Crisis of Illegal Coal Mining in Dima Hasao's Abandoned Mines

South Goa
Goa

In water-stressed Sancoale, locals protest Bhutani project with 700 swimming pools

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat puts solar power project near Gir sanctuary on hold amid protest

Dimapur
Nagaland

Global Naga Forum calls for relocation of Assam Rifles camps from urban areas

Dimapur
Nagaland

DNSU demands relocation of sub-centre in GMC Midland

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2015

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/tamil-nadu-says-no-to-indian-neutrino-observatory-project-in-theni-81604>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us