Telangana
,
Nyalkal and Jharasangam Mandals
,
Medak
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Telangana Farmers Refuse to Surrender Land for National Investment and Manufacturing Zone
Reported by
Seethalakshmi
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
5000
Households affected
People affected
2015
Year started
5113
Land area affected
5000
Households affected
People Affected
2015
Year started
5113
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In January 2016, the Centre approved the proposal for the National Investment and Manufacturing Zone (NIMZ) in Telangana. Setting up such manufacturing hubs is a part of the National Manufacturing Policy introduced in 2011 by the erstwhile Congress-led alliance government at the Centre to give a boost to the manufacturing sector and enhance its overall contribution to the country's gross domestic product. The total land proposed to be acquired for setting up the NIMZ in is 12,635 acres, spread across 17 villages in Nyalkal and Jharasangam mandals in the western part of the district. Since the project's announcement in 2015, various stakeholders have voiced opposition to it.
A large part of the land proposed to be acquired is privately owned. So far, the government has acquired only 2,900 acres of land. The problem, to begin with, is the farmers' refusal to part with their highly fertile land, which also holds substantial emotional value considering their complete dependence on farming for livelihood.
One of the other important issues with the project is that the Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited has been acquiring lands at INR 7-9 lakh per acre while the market price is about INR 25 lakh per acre. Additionally, the state is seeking to buy these land parcels through negotiations with the land owners under Government Order (GO) 123, which does not contain any provision for compensating the landless and other categories of people affected by alienation of government land (including commons) for the project.
In January 2017, the Telangana high court struck down GO 123 as unconstitutional and arbitrary. However, the government later managed to secure an interim stay on this order while promising to notify a revised GO with enhanced provisions for all the affected people. Protests persist till date.
As recently as January 2021, Scientists for People, a group of retired scientists, noticed and complained that there are several discrepancies in the NIMZ Environment Impact Assessment report and demanded that the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change reject it. Soon after, in the same month, a public hearing was held, after being postponed since July 2020 owing to the pandemic. However, villagers opposing the project were allegedly not allowed to participate, and several protesters were arrested by the police during the hearing using physical force. The stance of the villagers has only hardened with the way the police has dealt with them. However, in May 2022, the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change granted environmental clearance to the project.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2015

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Revenue Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Landless dalit agricultural labourers, NIMZ Rythula Poratha Samithi

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Seethalakshmi
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us