Assam
Malu gaon, Jharna Basti, China Basti, Saliki Basti, Margherita
,
Ledo
,
Tinsukia
Published :
Dec 2024
|
Updated :
Mass protests against CIL over coal dumping practices in Assam
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
700
Households affected
5000
People affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
700
Households affected
5000
People Affected
2024
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Since August 2024, residents of several villages in Margherita's Ledo area have protested over non-consensual land acquisition by Northeastern Coalfields, a unit of Coal India Limited’s (CIL), for dumping of coal mining debris.

More than 700 families expressed fears of eviction as the coal giant expanded its dumping grounds into Ledo's residential areas without adequate resettlement or compensation. Residents also alleged harassment and threats by Northeastern Coalfields (NEC) officials.

Mass protests, led by organizations such as the Satra Mukti Sangram Samiti (SMSS), have drawn participation from over 2,000 people. Protestors have accused NEC-CIL of forced evictions and environmental negligence.

Over the past few months, residents have also repeatedly raised concerns about the impact of waste dumping on their homes, and farmlands, affecting their overall health, fearing that continued operations could lead to irreparable environmental damage and unjustified displacement.

The protests started after the company issued notices for these families to vacate the area within 15 days to make way for a coal waste dumping ground often referred to as a "coal ash landfill" or "coal refuse area", designated for the disposal of byproducts from coal mining and combustion processes, such as coal ash and mine tailings.

The move is likely to impact communities of Jharna Basti, China Basti, and Malu Gaon no. 1, which collectively house over 1,500 individuals from a diverse range of ethnic backgrounds, including Tangsa, Gorkha, Hindi-speaking populations, Bengali Hindus, Muslims, Manipuris, and Adivasi groups. According to residents, the firm's activities have already destroyed their tea gardens and green spaces central to their livelihood and local ecology.

Despite initial assurances by CIL to halt dumping temporarily, villagers report resumed operations, which has only intensified protests.

A local political leader, who led a delegation to the site, called for negotiations between CIL and affected communities but is yet to achieve a lasting resolution. Community members argue that the Assam government has neglected their rights, pointing out that NEC’s activities have largely ignored environmental norms and the Forest (Conservation) Act’s land-use stipulations. In response, the community has demanded that CIL develop alternative dumping sites that do not encroach on residential zones or forested land.

In Malu Gaon, Nong Yongkuk, President of the Tangsa Jatiyo Parishad, revealed that repeated appeals to key officials—including the General Manager of NEC CIL, Margherita MLA Bhaskar Sharma, and the Tinsukia District Commissioner—had been met with silence.

In addition to environmental degradation, the dumping has spurred social and economic issues. A resident of Jharna Basti stated that a few officers of NEC CIL Margherita came to her house and gave her Rs 2 lakh as compensation for her 25 bighas of tea garden land, which Coal India Limited Margherita had turned into a "coal refuse area". They warned her to vacate her house immediately, threatening to vandalise it with the help of a bulldozer if she did not comply.

Villagers continue to demand that NEC-CIL and the Assam government prioritize ecological preservation and grant land rights.

In March 2024, Saliki village in the historical Patkai hills of the Tirap Tribal belt had become the epicentre of a protest led by the Sema Naga community against the establishment of a Coal refuse area around the village.

While speaking to LCW, community leaders emphasized that as their lands are damaged, they received no aid or resettlement options. One of the community leaders said, "CIL authorities have clearly said that either Coal India will have to be shut down or the communities will have to evacuate their land."

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1. To stop Coal India Ltd's exploitation 2. To Grant land rights to the communities

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Geology and Mining, Assam, Margherita sub-divisional administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Northeastern Coalfields, A unit of Coal India Public Ltd.

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Northeastern Coalfields, a unit of Coal India Limited (NEC, CIL)

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Yes

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Tangsa and Sema Naga Communities, All Assam Tangsa Student Union (AATSU), Satra Mukti Sangram Samiti, Tangsa Jatiyo Parishad, All Assam Gorkha Students Union (AAGSU), Tirap Autonomous District Council Demand Committee

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Residential area, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us