Nagaland
Dzuko valley
,
Kohima town
,
Kohima
Published :
Jun 2022
|
Updated :
Manipur and Nagaland border: Land row over Kezoltsa forest, Dzukou valley
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2022
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Border Dispute
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On March 21st, 2022, the Southern Angami Public Organization (SAPO) of Nagaland initiated a bandh or blockade on National Highway-2 (NH 2) to protest the actions of the Manipur government in the Kezoltsa forest area, which is located in the Dzukou valley that spreads over the boundaries of Nagaland and Manipur.

SAPO started the bandh to protest the deployment of security personnel by the Manipur Government in the forest, which they claim lies within Nagaland. However this claim was denied by the Government of Manipur, which alleged that Nagaland's armed forces were put up in areas which fall within Manipur's jurisdiction. SAPO and the Southern Angami Youth Organization (SAYO) initiated the bandh on NH-2 on March 21st, 2022. They demanded that the Manipur government pull out their security personnel from Kezoltsa forest within 72 hours. On March 24th, they declared this bandh indefinite as they felt the Manipur Government was unresponsive to their demands. SAPO chief Metekhrielie Mejura said “Despite all humble and polite approaches to withdraw armed personnel and stop any developmental activities, they never paid heed in any manner.” On the other hand, the United Committee, Manipur (UCM) notified that they would initiate a counter bandh if SAPO refused to stop the indefinite bandh. UCM President, Joychandra Konthoujam said “if SAPO fails to pay heed to the calls for withdrawal of the indefinite bandh then it will join hands with Manipuris settling in Assam to impose counter bandh.”

NH 2 runs from Assam to Nagaland, through Manipur. It is a significant road for Manipur, which as a land locked state, relies on it for procuring its goods. Economic blockades of this highway can lead to a disruption in the movement of people and goods in Manipur. Owing to its strategic importance, this highway is often subjected to blockades by civil society organisations of Nagaland for pressuring the Government of Manipur.

The Kezoltsa forest area has been a bone of contention between three Naga tribal communities since the British administration imposed arbitrary borders across the area. The communities include Marams and Mao Nagas of Manipur, and Angami Nagas of Nagaland. All three communities claim ancestral ownership over the land. The Mao and the Angami Nagas have been at loggerheads over this land since the 1970s.

In the recent past, the conflict flared up in 2015 in which the Angami Nagas were represented by SAPO while the Mao Nagas by Mao Council. Given that the conflict is over customary rights, the matter is usually addressed by the Tenyimia People's Organization (TPO), which is the top council for ten Naga tribes who identify themselves as part of the Tenyimia block and possess common ancestors. Both Mao and Angami Nagas are a part of this bloc. In 2017, the two tribes arrived at an understanding that they will maintain status quo over the land. SAPO considers the recent deployment of state personnel by the Manipur government a violation of that understanding.

On 31st March, 2022, SAPO suspended the indefinite blockade temporarily due to the statement by the TPO asking the Government of Manipur to withdraw their state personnel from Kezoltsa forest. Another reason for the suspension SAPO was the appeal they received from the Angami Public Organisation for facilitating their 50 years commemoration plans. However, SAPO has allegedly claimed that it will take actions again if the Manipur government does not abide by the TPO's statement.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to call back the armed personnel deployed in Kezoltsa forest by the Government of Manipur

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Nagaland, Government of Manipur

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Southern Angami Public Organization, Southern Angami Youth Organization, The United Committee, Manipur

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Emilo R. Yanthan

Emilo is pursuing her PhD in Political Science at the North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Her primary research areas include human and land rights and gender issues.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us