Jharkhand
,
Barbadih, Kutku
,
Palamu
Published :
Mar 2017
|
Updated :
September 19, 2024
Families displaced by Mandal Dam in Jharkhand opppose project resumption
Reported by
Alok
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
670
Households affected
3168
People affected
1972
Year started
1000
Land area affected
670
Households affected
3168
People Affected
1972
Year started
1000
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Multipurpose Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Families who were affected by the Mandal Dam project in Garhwa district are outraged over the state government's plan to resume construction work on the dam. The dam work on the North Koel river was started in 1972 but was halted over various reasons, such as protests, flooding due to the project and environmental concerns, among others. The project was also likely to submerge over 1,000 acres of forestland, including area under the Palamu Tiger Reserve.

In 2015, the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change announced that the reconstruction of the project will be completed, and in January 2019, Prime Minister Narendra Modi laid the foundation stone. But six years later, the work is yet to restart. While some of the dam-displaced families have outrightly opposed the project, others have demanded proper rehabilitation.

On August 8, 1997, the sluice gate of the incomplete dam was opened without warning allegedly to drive away protesters. Reportedly, 32 nearby villages were submerged overnight in the resulting flood while 21 people died. Many lost their properties and livestock.

On August 16, 1997, enraged over the deaths, a group of Maoists reportedly killed the dam's engineer, Baijnath Mishra. By the year end, nearly 90 per cent of the dam's work was complete.

Nearly half of the 1,000 square kilometre Palamu Tiger Reserve is expected to be submerged by the dam. The government is planning to build an embankment to prevent this. On the other hand, the project will help irrigate 124,270 hectares of agricultural land in Bihar and Jharkhand. However, most of the benefits would be available to Aurangabad district in Bihar, which will receive water for 111,800 hectares of parched agricultural land.

On March 21, 2017, a team appointed by the Union government, comprising officials from the Central Water Commission and North Koel Irrigation Project, visited the incomplete dam. Punit Minz, coordinator of Khan Khanij Sangh, said that the government is trying to rake up old issues which is akin to rubbing salt over the wounds of the tribespeople. He warned of an agitation if construction work of the dam is restarted.

In 2022, Palamu MP BD Ram stated that a lump sum special compensation has been arranged for the people of the area submerged by this dam. He added that the construction work will start soon.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://caravanmagazine.in/environment/jharkhand-mandal-dam-adivasi-protest> <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/three-years-on-mandal-dam-project-makes-no-headway/articleshow/88939741.cms>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

792

Type of investment:

Investment Made

Year of Estimation

1972

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Water Resources Department; Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Khan Khanij Sangh, Bindrai Institute for Research Study and Action, Coordination of Democratic Rights Organisations

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Alok
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for better access to common land/resources

Refusal to give up land for the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

2022

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://caravanmagazine.in/environment/jharkhand-mandal-dam-adivasi-protest> <https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ranchi/three-years-on-mandal-dam-project-makes-no-headway/articleshow/88939741.cms>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us