Andhra Pradesh
Maredupudi, Konchangi, Kundram, Veta Jangampalem, Sampathpuram and Koduru villages in Anakapalle Mandal
,
Valluru
,
Visakhapatnam
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Farmers Refuse To Give Up Land for Logistics Park in Andhra Pradesh
Reported by
Furkan Khan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
3000
People affected
2015
Year started
197
Land area affected
Households affected
3000
People Affected
2015
Year started
197
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Manufacturing
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2015, the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) identified and demarcated land for a proposed logistics park, a micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) park and an industrial park.
The logistics park, proposed in about 500 acres near Anakapalle, would be developed by the Vishakhapatnam port trust with an investment of INR 600 crore. The authorities claim that this park alone has the potential to generate more than 50,000 jobs, both direct and indirect. The industrial and the MSME parks are expected to attract investments of over INR 1,000 crore and generate over a lakh jobs.
The peasants who have been cultivating the land for the past 25-30 years are not ready to give up their land. They say some of them have D _pattas _(a category of _patta _ownership conferred by the Andhra Pradesh government which gives conditional _patta _on land), which legally recognizes them as tenants but not owners of land, while others have no documentary proof or title to prove that they have been using the land for years. So, they will not receive compensation as owners of the land.
On July 2016, the farmers in the area formed an association called the Land Oustees Association to oppose the state government’s plan to divert land for the park. They stopped the revenue department’s teams from entering the land to survey it at least three times in a month. They have also prevented government officials from entering their land for any kind of work.
Land Conflict Watch tried to get in touch with the Communist Party of India (Marxist), Andhra Pradesh branch, on April 16, 2020, but received no response.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

600

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2020

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

State of Andhra Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC)

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local Farmers, Land Oustees Association

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Furkan Khan
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us