Assam
Rangsali river bed area; Balipathar area (Bokajan), Laichan Nihanglangso River, Disobai River
,
Deithor
,
Karbi Anglong
Published :
|
Updated :
Locals raise concerns over unregulated sand mining in Karbi Anglong
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2019
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2019
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Assam's Karbi Anglong, illegal sand and gravel mining has surged due to rapid urbanisation and high demand from Dimapur and Manipur. While the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC) allows extraction through tenders, illegal mining has flourished, creating a black market. This has led to significant revenue losses for the KAAC, as trucks carrying illegally mined sand (worth Rs 10,000 to Rs 12,000 per load) operate without paying the required forest royalties.

In February 2024, various factions of the Karbi Students Association (KSA) and the Autonomous State Demand Committee accused the KAAC's Forest Department of allowing illegal sand mining in Karbi Anglong's water systems and rivers. The Jemson Timung faction of KSA alleged unlawful sand excavation in the Laichan Nihanglangso river and claimed that the Divisional Forest Officer has ignored their complaints regarding this violation of the Rivers and Canals Act, 1863. Additionally, the Forest Range Officer, Nickson Ronghang, reportedly sought to negotiate with the KSA and has been accused of receiving kickbacks of Rs 1,500 per truck carrying sand without proper documentation. The KSA demanded strict action against forest authorities for damaging the river.

According to a complaint to the Central Empowered Committee, widespread sand mining and stone quarrying in Assam's Deithor and Rangsali rivers violate Supreme Court orders. The Supreme Court while hearing the TN Godavarman Vs Union of India and others on 12 April 2019, in a related matter on sand mining in Karbi Anglong said: “We order that all kind of mining and related activities along the aforesaid Kaziranga National Park area and in the entire catchment area of rivers/streams and rivulets originating in Karbi Anglong Hill ranges and flowing into Kaziranga National Park, including the tiger reserve are restrained. No new construction shall be permitted on private lands which form part of the nine identified animal corridors.”

But in a letter dated 3 July 2024 to CEC, environmentalist Mukrang Engleng said: “The impact of sand mining through machinery in the Deithor and Rangsali rivers has led to habitat destruction, erosion of river banks, alteration of river flow patterns, and disruption of aquatic ecosystems. It has also resulted in the loss of biodiversity, the fish populations have also declined drastically, and the degradation of water quality has also increased drastically posing health risks to both human and animal lives. Furthermore, sand mining has exacerbated flooding, as it alters the natural sediment balance of the river. Socially and economically, it has affected communities that rely on rivers for livelihoods, such as fishing and agriculture”.

These activities also threaten the ecosystem, including Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve and the Kaziranga-Karbi Anglong Elephant Reserve. Nearly 200 wild animals, including 10 rhinos, had been killed in Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve (KNPTR) in Assam due to annual floods since May 2024. KNPTR, covering 1,300 square kilometres, is home to over 2,600 one-horned rhinos, making it their largest habitat.

The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was established by the Supreme Court of India on 9 May 2002, in the case of TN Godavarman Thirumalpad Vs Union of India. Its role is to monitor the implementation of the Court's orders and address cases of non-compliance.

“These rivers and rivulets are used by indigenous people. They are sacred to us and we want access to our clean rivers. That is why I have decided to highlight the problem. Everyone in this region is very scared to speak up against mining,” said Mukrang Engleng, an engineer by profession and environmentalist.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

To ban illegal sand and gravel mining

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (KAAC), Assam Forest Department, District Forest Department (Karbi Anglong), Divisional Forest Office, East Division, MoEFCC, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Assam)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Diphu District Committee of the Karbi Students Association, Autonomous State Demand Committee, Karbi Students Association

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us