Maharashtra
Parner Taluka
,
Shirsule
,
Ahmednagar
Published :
Sep 2024
|
Updated :
Locals oppose tree felling for Jal Jeevan Mission Project in Ahmednagar; Bombay HC orders stay
Reported by
Maitreya Ghorpade
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
121
Households affected
691
People affected
2023
Year started
6
Land area affected
121
Households affected
691
People Affected
2023
Year started
6
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Water Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Water Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The use of 6.07 hectares of land situated in Shirsule village of Ahmednagar to construct a water supply project is a present cause of concern for various local residents of the area.

The project is being executed by Maharashtra Government’s Water Supply and Sanitation Department, also known as the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (MJP), under the auspices of Central Government’s flagship Jal Jeevan Mission, that plans to bring water to every tap across India.

The project, planned on government-owned land, envisions construction of a water treatment plant as well as a water tank to supply water to locals of neighbouring villages.

However, the primary grievance of local residents’ concerns tree felling proposed to be undertaken for the project. As per the testimony of local farmer Baban Kawad, the said area of 6.07 ha presently holds somewhere between 1000-1200 trees which are likely to be felled or damaged during construction of the water supply project. “This forest was planted by the villagers, who continue to rely on forest produce for their livelihoods. There are also peacocks and leopards who live in this forest. This project will destroy it all,” claimed Kawad.

Another local farmer, Digambhar Ghogare, states that there are various encroachments in and around the same area, that have been illegally constructed. Ghogare states that there is no need to fell the trees for the project, which should instead be executed in a place of the existing encroachments. A case filed in 2019 concerning the alleged illegal encroachments is currently pending before the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay.

Members of the Gram Panchayat of Shirsule have been actively pursuing a protest against the project, and has even stated that they are likely to go on hunger strike if the project is not cancelled. Due to local pressure, the Forest Department of Maharashtra has denied permission sought by the District Collector, Ahmednagar, for felling of 820 trees on 4 March 2024. However, the MJP issued a special request letter to the Police Superintendent of Ahmednagar on 3 April 2024, seeking police assistance in construction of the project to be undertaken by the MJP.

Fearing grant of police assistance, Digambhar Ghogare approached the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay through a Writ Petition. On 22 May 2024, the High Court granted a stay on tree-felling for the project until the next date of hearing.

Advocate Swapnil Mule, the counsel for the petitioner in the matter, stated that the trees being felled were of an advanced age which were being illegally felled for the project. Hence, the High Court intervened and granted interim relief in the matter.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran; District Collector Ahmednagar

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gram Panchayat, Shirsule

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Maitreya Prithwiraj Ghorpade

Maitreya is an independent environmental law practitioner having secured a B.A.LL.B. (Hons) from Hidayatullah National Law University.

Initiating his legal practice at the chambers of ex-President of the NGT Western Zone Bar Association Adv. Asim Sarode, Maitreya has gone on to work with the 2021 Right Livelihood awardee 'Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment' (LIFE) before commencing independent environmental law practice before various benches of the National Green Tribunal in 2022.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Grazing, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us