Sikkim
,
Dzongu
,
North District
Published :
Mar 2017
|
Updated :
Lepchas of Dzongu in Sikkim Oppose Teesta Stage IV Hydroelectric Project; Refuse Compensation, Rehabilitation
Reported by
Athar Parvaiz
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
4513
People affected
2008
Year started
324
Land area affected
Households affected
4513
People Affected
2008
Year started
324
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Lepcha community in north Sikkim has been staunchly opposing the construction of a 520megawatt Teesta Stage IV Hydroelectric Project (HEP) in Dzongu district. At the core of their opposition are their religious beliefs. According to them, Dzongu is the origin place of their race (Lepcha). They say that Khangchendzonga is "our mother mountain where our souls ultimately get salvation". The Lepchas believe the environment is under threat due to an increasing number of power projects in the region despite their opposition. The Dzongu area is protected under a 1956 notification and reserved for the Lepchas. So far, they have successfully protested against the construction of four other hydropower projects in the area. In 2008, the state government had signed a memorandum of understanding with the National Hydro Power Corporation (NHPC) for this project. In 2012, the project was granted clearance for implementation. In July 2020, when the land revenue department formed an expert committee for the Social Impact Assessment, all panchayats in the region refused to cooperate with the surveying officials, fearing the destruction of the rich Himalayan ecosystem and the cultural heritage of the Lepcha community. The villagers also boycotted the mandatory public hearing and rejected the project under the Forest Rights Act. They claim that the NHPC has not taken any safety precautions. Since June 2020, several protests have been held, and several attempts to meet higher officials have failed. The community claims that police force in the region has been increased to keep a close eye on them. In January 2021, Gyatso Tongden Lepcha, secretary of the Affected Citizens of Teesta, stated, "We [have] observed several landslides, flash floods and earthquakes after the construction of dams on Teesta river in Dikchu and Chungthang; we believe dams are not the solution to sustainable development." According to the Environmental Impact Assessment report, around 256 families will be affected and none will be displaced. But the villagers estimate that more than 4,500 people will be directly affected. The community refuses to accept any compensation or rehabilitation in exchange for its land and is determined to safeguard its heritage. As of 2021, 15 hydropower projects in the Teesta river basin are at different stages of construction and are set to be completed by 2022. The newly elected Sikkim Krantikari Morcha party, which came to power by campaigning against overexploitation of natural resources, has been silent on the issue so far, according to Gyatso, leaving the community to fend for themselves.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest, Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

5748.04

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Land Revenue Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

National Hydro Power Corporation Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

NHPC

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Sikkim Krantikari Morcha

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Athar Parvaiz
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us