Assam
Rangamahal
,
Guwahati
,
Kamrup Metropolitan
Published :
Aug 2023
|
Updated :
October 5, 2024
Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2023
Year started
25
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2023
Year started
25
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Infrastructure
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Infrastructure
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

On 27 June 2023, lawyers of the Gauhati High Court Bar Association (GHCBA) staged sit-in protests opposing the proposed plan of relocating the Gauhati High Court to the Rangmahal area in the Kamrup (Rural) district of Assam.

Previously known as the High Court of Assam, Gauhati High Court for four states - Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram & Nagaland - was established in 1948 and the old court building was set up in 1960.

The government plans to construct a judicial city in Assam's Amingaon where the court will be shifted to. Located in Kamrup (rural) district, the proposed location lies on the northern bank of river Bhramaputra. Amingaon city is almost 30 km away from the present courthouse.

The Gauhati High Court Bar Association (GHCBA) submitted a memorandum to the President of India, the Chief Justice of India, the Union Law Minister, the Governor and the Chief Minister of Assam, expressing their dissent on the Government's decision to shift the present High Court.

The lawyers assert that the shifting of the court complex to a remote location would have a negative impact on their productivity as they will have to spend a longer time on commute.

While addressing the media, one of the protesting lawyers said, "There was no demand from the lawyers or the public at large that we've got difficulty in the present set-up of courts. The justification given by the government for the expansion of the courts citing that there isn't sufficient space for the people here is not true. We are suspecting that the decision may not be in the public interest but for personal gain. We believe there are vested interests involved here_._"

Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma announced the release of a draft of the relocation plan on 14 April 2023. A high-level committee was formed on 23 May 2023, to examine the proposed site measuring 240 bighas, out of which 100 bighas were meant to be entitled to the Gauhati High Court, other judicial courts of the Kamrup area, and residential accommodation for judges and staff. 

The GHCBA stated, "The place where the proposed judicial city is to come up is yet to have any kind of infrastructure, and at present, it can be reached from Guwahati by traveling over the Saraighat Bridge, which takes about 30 km of travel, or by ferry service. However, a new bridge is being constructed over the river Brahmaputra by a company which has the dubious distinction of its under-construction bridge over river Ganga collapsing like a pack of cards."

On 29 January 2024, in a response to the Gauhati High Court Bar Association against the decision to shift the Gauhati High Court and other lower courts from Gauhati, the Secretary to the government of Assam, Judicial Department, Romen Baruah, informed that the Government of Assam had constituted a high Level Committee consisting of the sitting judges of the High Court to examine the feasibility of establishing a so-called Judicial Township and that the court agrees in principle with the proposal for the establishment of a Judicial Township at Rangmahal, North Guwahati.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

To allocate space in and around the present high court location for expansion of the Judicial infrastructure

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Chief Secretary of Assam; Legal Remembrancer (LR) and Secretary Judicial Department; Kamrup Deputy Commissioner; Special Secretary of Public Works Department (building and national highways)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us