Chhattisgarh
Bhathagaon, Raipura, Sarona, Chandandih, Atari, Hathbandh, Gomchi, Guma and Bana villages from Raipur district, and Khudmuda, Amleshwar, Bhothali, Magarghata, Kumhari, Kapasda and Akola in Durg district
,
Mahadev Ghat
,
Raipur
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Farmers, Activists Oppose Kharun Riverfront Development Project in Chhattisgarh, Fear Ecological Damage
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
8766
People affected
2015
Year started
1193
Land area affected
Households affected
8766
People Affected
2015
Year started
1193
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

As part of the Raipur Master Plan, the Chhattisgarh government has planned the Kharun Riverfront Development Project. The project is modelled on the Sabarmati Riverfront Development Project in Gujarat and would spread over the riverbank in Raipur and Durg districts. To this end, the government announced an integrated plan in September 2015. In the same year, the survey work for the project also started. The proposed project will require over 1,100 hectares of land from 22 villages, which would affect the lives of at least 50 per cent of the population. The local people and civil society outfits have opposed the project and said that the state planned it without studying the impact on the ecosystem. In January 2016, farmers from the villages on both sides of the river organised themselves under the banner of Rashtriya Kisan Kranti Morcha (RKKM) to oppose the land acquisition for the project. They claimed that they did not receive prior information about the project and also objected to the low rate of compensation. In the same month, the chief minister informed the State Assembly that the government did not plan to acquire private land and would only use government land for the project. But the RKKM president accused the state government of acquiring cultivable land, which formed 76 per cent of the project land. In March, the affected farmers organised a protest at Mahadev Ghat in Raipur. Since then, there have been multiple organised rallies, panchayat meetings, jal satyagrahas as well as FIRs. As a result, the Raipur Development Authority decided to set up a separate body to manage the development project, namely Special Area Development Authority (SADA). However, the protests ended after the state government suspended the project and decided not to formulate SADA. The decision reportedly came in response to the high compensatory cost for over 900 hectares of private land. But this did not put a complete stop to other projectrelated activities.   According to a 2017 academic research paper (see attached documents), the riverfront development would lead to changes in the landuse pattern of the project area. It would restrict access to water bodies and impact the livelihoods of people dependent on the river. The project proposed to tackle the pollution of the river caused by the unregulated drainage of sewage. However, the villagers, experts and activists fear that the development is only purposed for commercial and tourist gains and would further degrade the river and intrude upon its natural course. Therefore, they raised concerns about the ecological, economic and social implications of the project. They widely argued that the government should divert its focus to conserving the river and consider the interests of the communities residing on its banks.  Following the election of the new state government in December 2018, the project again picked up pace after almost three years. In September 2020, the administration announced a plan to construct a bridge to connect the villages on either side of the river. The administration envisions the bridge to be like a marine drive, spread over nine kilometres between Mahadev Ghat and Bhothali village.  Earlier in the year, the planning committee visited the riverfront with other state officials and proposed the area for construction. They also plan to beautify and increase the green cover. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Both

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Raipur District Administration, Raipur Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

WAPCOS Limited

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Beyond Built Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Kisan Kranti Morcha, Chhattisgarh Bachao Andolan, Nadi Ghati Morcha

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for more compensation than promised

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us