Himachal Pradesh
,
Jispa
,
Lahaul and Spiti
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Locals Oppose Jispa Dam Project in Lahaul and Spiti Valley
Reported by
Bimla Vishwapremi
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
960
People affected
2009
Year started
1323
Land area affected
Households affected
960
People Affected
2009
Year started
1323
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Hydroelectric Project
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Since 2009, the residents of the fourteen villages in the tribal district of LahaulSpiti valley, Himachal Pradesh, have been opposing the proposed Jispa Dam and Hydropower Project.   The proposed 300 MW dam, located on the Bhanga river, would hold 0.8 millionacre feet of water to feed 11 major power projects downstream in the Chenab river basin. In 2008, the dam was allocated to the Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd (HPPCL), after it was declared a National Water Resource project.  As per the prefeasibility report, the dam would result in the submergence of at least four villages and displace 74 families. However, according to a preliminary report by Him Dhara Collective, the project would result in complete or partial submergence of 12 villages, Darcha 1 and 2, Sumdu, Limkyum, Rarik, Gandaj, Balijim, Yoche, Chikka, Dogma, Nama, Ranglyo and Makseen. Also, it would displace more than 250 families and submerge 40 shops. The report also states that the construction of an 18kilometre long canal would dry the natural water resources. Consequently, it will harm the availability of drinking and irrigation water in at least ten villages.  The locals have collected under the banner of Jispa Bandh Jan Sangharsh Samiti. They stand opposed to the project due to the threat of displacement and severe impact on livelihood practices, agricultural lands, and water sources. The concerns also stem from the ecological fragility of the region. In January 2014, a local delegation met with the Chief Minister to discuss the situation. It also met with the then Tribal Minister and Power department in March of the same year.  As per a news report, the Samiti submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister, Chief Minister, and the National Green Tribunal in October 2015. Earlier, the protestors had stopped the team from working at the site. However, the Managing Director of HPPCL, claimed the tribals fear was baseless as the project will positively impact the local ecology.  In September 2016, following protests by the tribal communities, HPPCL suspended the project survey work. The corporation stated that it would begin to restart the investigation when the locals will extend their support. In July 2017, HPPCL held a public meeting with the residents of Jaspa village to request cooperation for investigation and survey for the project. They reemphasized the national importance of the project. However, Regzin Hyrpa, convenor of the Samiti, stated that the villagers reject the project due to the threat of environmental damage similar to the Kinnaur hydro projects. Since the locals have continued to oppose the project. They have not allowed any investigation or survey work either. However, the project is yet not withdrawn.  In February 2020, a newspaper article reported that the corporation plans to do investigation and survey work again after concluding talks with the centre. As per the report, an HPPCL official stated that the process will start again to select a new location for the project, to which the locals will have no objection.  In January 2021, the president of the Samiti reasserted the locals' opposition to the hydropower projects proposed in the valley. He stated that the projects will prove to be disastrous for the ecology and biodiversity of the region. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to dispose off the project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

5000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, Ministry of Environment and Forest

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Bimla Vishwapremi
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us