Chhattisgarh
,
Jawartara village
,
Kanker
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
Gond Tribe in Chhattisgarh Oppose Jawartara Power Sub-station, Allege No Consent Taken
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
650
People affected
2014
Year started
4
Land area affected
Households affected
650
People Affected
2014
Year started
4
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Transmission Lines
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Transmission Lines
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Residents of Jawartara village, part of Kantagaon Gram Sabha in Kanker district, claim that the state government had illegally acquired 3.93 hectares of land in 2014. According to a local news report, the government allocated this land to the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board for constructing a 132/33 kV power substation.  The villagers registered strong opposition to this. Jawartara, primarily inhabited by Gond tribespeople, is a Schedule V area, and the residents see the land allocation as a violation of their rights. According to a local daily, the community members claim it to be common land and use it as a burial ground and school playground. There's also a shrine dedicated to the tribe's deity, Burha Deo.  Since 2014, the residents of Jawartara had been protesting before state and district authorities to stop the project. They wrote to various authorities demanding action against the proposal and submitted requests to the panchayat to organise a Gram Sabha for passing a resolution against the project as well as to hold public meetings. Reportedly, the villagers staged protests outside the office of the District Collector as well as the block tehsildar. However, their actions failed to persuade the authorities to act against the project. Meanwhile, the construction work had already started.  In 2016, the villagers filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) at the High Court of Chhattisgarh. The residents claimed that the land was acquired without the necessary consent of the Gram Sabha.  On December 7, 2016, the high court ordered the commissioner of Bastar division and the district collector to visit and inspect the site of the dispute and explore alternatives. The court also demanded a report within six weeks. On December 26, the villagers put up tents near the substation and organised a protest. They demanded the administration to invalidate the consent given by the Gram Sabha on July 23, 2013, and requested to shift the power substation to an alternate location.  Based on the high court directive, the commissioner and district collector, alongwith other officials, visited the village for an inspection. They explained to the Gond tribe members that the site was chosen after careful consideration and that the substation was necessary to solve the electricity shortage in the area. However, the tribespeople threatened to continue protesting until the administration agreed to follow the correct procedure for acquiring their consent. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Kanker district administration

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Gondwana Samaj

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us