Jammu and Kashmir
,
Aru, Mamal, Lidroo
,
Anantnag
Published :
Aug 2021
|
Updated :
J&K Administration Demolishes Homes of over 70 Gujjar, Bakerwal Families in Pahalgam
Reported by
Rabiya Bashir
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
70
Households affected
People affected
2020
Year started
52
Land area affected
70
Households affected
People Affected
2020
Year started
52
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In November 2020, the Jammu and Kashmir government demolished at least 70 shelters of Gujjar and Bakerwal families in the remote areas of Pahalgam – Aru, Mamal and Lidroo. According to the Pahalgam Development Authority (PDA), 51.5 hectares of forestland (1,020 kanals) were encroached by these nomadic tribes as they built temporary huts – called dokas – on land owned by the forest department.

“We had to follow the orders of the high court to retrieve 2,600 kanals of encroached land across Anantnag, which belongs to the forest department. “We cannot allow encroachment of forestland,” PDA CEO Mushtaq Simnani told LCW.

The PDA had also reportedly issued notices to the families, warning them of forced demolition if they failed to raze their structures themselves and asking them to vacate the land. According to the local people, the authorities in the Lidroo-Wangidar area demolished more than 13 dokas. “Where will we go during the harsh winter? Why will we leave this place when it is our own? We have been living here since ages,” Ahmad told journalists.

Gujjar activist Talib Hussain told LCW, “It is a misnomer to call it encroachment in the first place. The tribal communities are forest people, and these temporary sheds have been their homes for decades. They are not a threat to the forests or the ecology because their traditional lifestyle and culture are in harmony with nature. Their presence, in fact, ensures protection of the forests.”

Javed Rahi, prominent tribal activist in the region, also told LCW that the forests have always been the home of nomadic communities and that the Gujjars and Bakerwals depend on these forests for their livelihood and survival.

The Gujjars and Bakerwals are recognised in the region as Scheduled Tribes, or forest dwellers, under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006. Nomads by nature, the communities move from place to place in search of fodder for their livestock. Their settlement on common land is often termed encroachment by the state as they have no legal titles over what the state considers government land.

The absence of permanent land to settle in and the lack of legal titles as well as laws to safeguard their interests has left these nomadic communities vulnerable. The FRA recognises the right of forest-dwelling communities to live on forestland and cultivate the same and mandates that no forest dweller can be evicted if their claim for rights is pending. But the Act is yet to be implemented in Jammu and Kashmir.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest department, Pahalgam Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rabiya Bashir

Rabiya is an independent journalist based in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, having completed her Master’s in Journalism and Mass Communication. With a field experience of seven years, she has worked with regional and national media houses in Delhi and Srinagar. Her work focuses on environment, politics, women, health, culture and human rights, with her primary focus being on climate change, renewable energy, forest, food security, sustainable food and agriculture.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us