Arunachal Pradesh
Dibang Wildlife Sanctuary
,
Roing
,
Dibang Valley
Published :
Feb 2024
|
Updated :
Indigenous Idu Mishmis oppose proposed tiger reserve in Arunachal Pradesh's Dibang Valley
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
12000
People affected
2023
Year started
414900
Land area affected
Households affected
12000
People Affected
2023
Year started
414900
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Union government's plan to notify Dibang Wildlife Sanctuary (DWLS) in Arunachal Pradesh as a tiger reserve has caused unrest among the indigenous Idu Mishmi tribe.

The Idu Mishmi tribe believes that if the Dibang sanctuary becomes a Tiger Reserve, their rights to the forest will be further limited, which will affect their livelihood. The community’s apex body, the Idu Mishmi Cultural Literary Society, has dubbed it a ploy to “dislodge” the locals from their homes. “The tiger reserve will cover a lot of areas and there will be no place for us to stay,” said Ista Pulu, who heads the body.

The Idu Mishmi is a sub-tribe of the Mishmi group in Arunachal Pradesh and neighbouring Tibet. The other two groups are Digaru and Miju. The community is known for its expert craftsmanship and weaving, and they primarily live in Mishmi Hills, bordering Tibet.

On 24 May 2023, a large number of women in the Dibang Valley district took out a peaceful rally in protest against the proposed Tiger Reserve and re-demarcation of Dibang Wildlife Sanctuary and submitted a memorandum to the District Forest Officer (DFO) with a request to look into the grievances of the people of the district.

The community says that they had registered their protest from the time of the proposal to make Dibang Valley a wildlife sanctuary. The local Idu Mishmis claimed that it was notified as a wildlife sanctuary without following due procedures. They added that the government did not settle the residents’ land ownership claims before declaring it a protected area.

Ebbo Mili, an advocate from the Idu Mishmi community, says that as per the provisions of the Wildlife Protection Act or Forest Rights Act (FRA), a meeting should have been conducted with the locals before declaring the Dibang Wildlife Sanctuary, which didn’t happen. “Idu Mishmis are forest dwellers, FRA was applicable here and a meeting should have been arranged chaired by the Gram Panchayat. However, the District Collector (DC) wrote a letter saying that there were no claims or objections by the villagers despite them being given eight months. They arbitrarily declared it as Wildlife Sanctuary and didn’t entertain the claims and objections.”

“According to the Wildlife Protection Act, if the government takes land, there has to be a meeting and if there’s rehabilitation needed, relocation needed, everything needs to be done. But nothing was addressed,” said Itanagar-based advocate Ebbo Mili, an Idu Mishmi himself.

While the plan to declare DWLS a Tiger Reserve had been in the offing for several years, the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) approved the plan in April 2023 at its meeting. The NTCA had written to the Forest Department twice – in 2014 and 2016 – seeking a proposal from the state government for declaration of the sanctuary as a tiger reserve.

In December 2012, the local Idu Mishmi people had spotted three tiger cubs in the Dibang Valley and informed the Forest Department officials. In 2014, the Wildlife Institute of India and the NTCA recorded the presence of 11 tigers in a radius of 336 square kilometers in this valley.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Other environmental services, Water bodies, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Data Unavailable

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PCCF Arunachal Pradesh, Forest Department Dibang Valley

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

IDU (Mishmi) ELITE SOCIETY (IMES), All Idu Mishmi Students Union (AIMSU), Dibang Valley Students' Union (DVSU),

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Other environmental services, Water bodies, Government or community-regulated urban commons

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Data Unavailable

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us