Madhya Pradesh
,
Keolari Kalan
,
Sagar
Published :
Oct 2022
|
Updated :
Incorrect land record digitisation dispossesses families belonging to Dalits and Tribes people in rural Madhya Pradesh
Reported by
Satish Bhartiya
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
23
Households affected
People affected
2018
Year started
33
Land area affected
23
Households affected
People Affected
2018
Year started
33
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Land Use
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Kesli tehsil of Sagar district in Madhya Pradesh, lands of actual owners were registered in the name of others when the land records were being digitised.

Social workers and state officials based in Madhya Pradesh allege that this wrong transfer of ownership has been done mostly on the lands of tribes people and Dalit families.

In 1999-2000, the Madhya Pradesh government under the Union government scheme of computerisation of land records, digitised land records of more than 55,000 villages. Which includes Kesli tehsil, located 65 kilometres away from Sagar district headquarters.

The two documents in the hands of the LCW include the report written by the Patwari to the Tehsildar and the revenue order follow-up letter. These letters revealed the conversion of a total of 30 people in 126.56 acres (51.21 hectares) of land in Kesli. Out of which the land records of 10 people were improved. The wrong name is entered on 20.

According to this report of the year 2018 (which is with LCW) of Shailendra Singh, who was a Patwari in Kesli Tehsil, the former Patwaris registered improper names in the records without the orders of the Presiding Officer (Tehsildar). This report details the wrong conversions of 23 people (mostly Adivasis and Dalits) in a total of 33.21 hectares of land.

Shailendra says "These cases are of fraud and dishonesty under Section 420 (Indian Penal Code). The Collector's order led to action and "probably" 16 records were rectified."

But when the LCW examined the documents, the wrong records of the land of 14 out of 23 people were found intact.

Another example of wrongful transfer of land ownership was shared with LCW by RTI activist Dhaniram Gupta. According to a letter he received from the land and revenue department of Sagar district administration, in November 2019, the Kesli Tehsildar presented the inquiry report in the public hearing in the complaint of altering the records with the connivance of the officers and employees on the land. 17 complainants from five villages were present in the public hearing.

In this transfer, Gupta claims, “On the request of these 17 people, the then Sagar Collector Preeti Maithil got the names of these eligible people registered in 2019. But 100 percent of this land is still in the possession of illegal people.” Mittu Ahirwar, a resident of village Idalpur confirms this, he says, “My name has been registered on the land (0.81 ha), but the possession is still with Ramnath. When we ask him for land, then he says, we will cut off his arms and legs.

At the same time, many people are also struggling to get the land registered in their names. One of which is also the Veersing Gond of Basa village. Speaking to LCW, he said, “my land – 40 acres i.e. 16.18 hectares – has been in my possession for 60 years but the mutation has transferred my land to nine people from another panchayat. I have already complained about this incorrect mutation to the Tehsildar, Collector and the Chief Minister's helpline number, but am yet to receive a response.

According to the Government of India, the Land Computerisation Record (LCR) in Madhya Pradesh has been 100 percent. But the government land given to the landless in the year 2000 has not been computerised. Ganesh Chadar of Keolari Kalan in Kesali—the Dalit community—had received a lease of 2.47 acres (1 hectare) of government land in the year 2000. Speaking to LCW, he said, “I bribed the patwari Rs 2,000 to get the land record computerised. I also asked for help from the CM helpline number. Even then the land was not computerised. Because of this we never got the benefit of Kisan Credit Card scheme.

The Tehsildar of Kesli refused to speak with LCW, while the district collector of Sagar, Deepak Arya, said he had no information about this matter.

However, a few days ago, the Collector's statement came to the fore in the media report regarding the transfer of land. In this, he said, "If there is a written complaint of land conversion, then investigation will be done and those who are guilty will be punished with departmental action."

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Correcting errors in land records during digitisation to transfer ownership to original owners and halting illegal capture of land by influential parties

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

N/A

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

"Agricultural land, Residential area"

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Satish Bhartiya
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

"Agricultural land, Residential area"

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us