Assam
Kompaduli, Lep Gaon, Dhansiri Forest Division, Boko, Bodoland Territorial Region (BTR), Tangla,
,
Gohalkona
,
Udalguri
Published :
Aug 2024
|
Updated :
Illegal sand, gravel mining endangers rich biodiversity in Assam's Udalguri
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
100
Households affected
480
People affected
2020
Year started
Land area affected
100
Households affected
480
People Affected
2020
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Sand Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Udalguri district in Assam, situated along the Indo-Bhutan border, harbours a diverse ecosystem and abundant natural resources. However, this area has been exploited by unscrupulous individuals, including contractors, black market traders, and certain entrusted officials. Over the last few years, stone quarries and crushers have reportedly damaged the rivers.

On 5 June 2023, the Border Area Development Youth Organisation submitted a memorandum to Bhupender Yadav, the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change, raising concerns about the sand mining activities in the Boko (Chisol) river. The organisation highlighted that the contractor's sand mining activities exceeded agreed-upon GPS coordinates and recommended depth, resulting in depleted water levels and unsuitable water quality for humans and wildlife.

One year later, on 5 June 2024, on World Environment Day, residents from several areas protested against illegal sand and gravel mining from the Boko River in the Lepgaon area. The protest also included tree plantations and drew hundreds of participants, including women and children. 

Jonson Sangma, the president of the Border Area Development Youth Organisation, expressed frustration over repeated, ignored appeals to various officials, including the SDC, Ranger, DC, DFO, and the Forest Minister, to halt the mining activities. "The sand gravel mining started on 25 January 2023, and since then, the river water has become unusable and polluted. People can no longer use the water for bathing or other purposes, and even cattle refuse to drink it," Sangma stated.

The Singra Forest Range Office's Range Officer, Bhargabh Hazarika, assured that he would investigate the matter thoroughly and take necessary action.

During the 1990s, a distressing surge of deforestation occurred in the Dhansiri Forest Division (formerly Darrang district), leading to the depletion of valuable trees from the Khalingduar Reserved Forest and Bornadi Wildlife Sanctuary. This exploitation, allegedly sanctioned by the government and involving former insurgents, extended to the district's rivers, where sand and rocks became prime targets. Over the last few decades, contractors and traders, often colluding with forest officials and public representatives, have engaged in legal and illegal extraction of minerals from the northern rivers using excavators and dredgers. 

Reports indicate excessive extraction, primarily for external projects, being transported in hundreds trucks, often lacking proper documentation, prompting local authorities in Tangla town to restrict their movement during peak hours. Besides riverbeds, the unauthorised establishment and operation of stone crushers near the India-Bhutan border pose grave environmental risks, flaunting regulations and neglecting pollution control measures. These crushers encroach on agricultural land, causing significant noise and air pollution and posing a severe environmental threat. Despite the revenue generated from these activities, the alleged inaction of the Forest Department has garnered considerable criticism.

Residents have been demanding a thorough investigation into the role of the Dhansiri Forest Division, advocating for the removal of potentially corrupt officials and the cessation of illegal sand mining and environmentally damaging crushers. 

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to end sand/gravel mining

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Bodoland Territorial Council, Dhansiri Forest Division, Deputy Commissioner (Udalguri), Forestry and Wildlife Department (BTC), PCCF (Assam), Forest Department of Assam, Rabha Hasong Autonomous Council (RHAC)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Border Area Development Youth Organisation

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to cancel the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Water bodies, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us