Kantabai curses the rainfall for destroying her remaining belongings, as she continues to keep fighting for the land she was evicted from on 6 June, 2024. She now lives on the footpath adjacent to the demolished Jai Bhim Nagar.
The residents of Jai Bhim Nagar were anticipating demolitions since the public notice was posted near their settlement on 3 June, 2024. They sent a legal notice to the assistant municipal commissioner of S-ward of Greater Mumbai Municipal Corporation on 5 of June. The notice mentioned of government resolution of Maharashtra government 2021, prohibiting eviction of all residential structures during monsoon period (1st June to 30 September). It further stated that the procedures laid out on eviction and rehabilitation of slum dwellers in the Maharashtra Slum Act 1971 were not being followed in the current demolition. Even after such a notice, the houses were demolished on 6 June 2024.
The settlement started emerging in 1994 when the area was sparsely populated. In 2007, Lake View Developers had lost in the Bombay High Court a case seeking the ownership of land (Appeal from order no. 320 of 2007). While the court denied Lake View Developers ownership rights, the developers sought permissions from MCGM to develop labour camp on the said land in the same year. These permissions were granted to them but were later revoked in 2014. The land was then [reserved for construction of Government offices](https://dpremarks.mcgm.gov.in/dp2034/reports/DP_SHEETS/SM Sheets 2034 08.05.2018/03 Eastern Suburbs/ES 37.PDF). However, the labour camps continued to exist.
In 2017, the MCGM ordered Lake View Developers to remove encroachments from the land for the construction of government offices. While the land records do not mention Lake View Developers as the owners of the said land, the MCGM continues to address them as the owners.
A case in the State Human Rights Commission in 2023, declared that Hiranandani builders was trying to encroach and occupy the land by settling a labour camp on the said land. On 3 June 2024, a public notice was issued declaring the hutments as illegal encroachments, leading to the evictions and violent clashes between police and residents on 6 June 2024.
On 6 June 2024, hundreds of policemen along with demolition squads of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) arrived in Jai Bhim Nagar to evict the residents. The residents claimed that the bouncers of Hiranandani builder had been harassing the locals for the past few days. On 6th June, the residents claimed that these bouncers started breaking into homes and attacking residents including children and women. This led to retaliation by locals.
The police, however, lathicharged and started beating the residents including women and children and trampling the portraits of Dr BR Ambedkar. This further escalated the violence, leading to stone pelting. As many as 20 police personnel, including an ACP rank officer, and five engineers of the BMC, were among 35 injured in the stone-pelting incident.
The police filed charges against 200 people and arrested 61 people under 19 different sections of IPC including Section 324 and 326.
Since then, the evicted people have been braving the rains and living in plastic houses on the footpath trying to fight against the eviction through hunger strikes, protest marches and negotiations with Hiranandani and BMC officials.
Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Demand for rehabilitation
Complaint against procedural violations
Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community
Region Classification
Urban
Type of Land
Private
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)
Status of Project
Original Project Deadline
Whether the Project has been Delayed
Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users
Residential area
Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict
Source/Reference
Total investment involved (in Crores):
₹
Type of investment:
Year of Estimation
Has the Conflict Ended?
No
When did it end?
Why did the conflict end?
Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict
Legislations/Policies Involved
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute
No
What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?
What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?
Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:
Forced evictions/dispossession of land
Non-rehabilitation of displaced people
Lack of legal protection over land rights
Legal Status:
In Court
Status of Case In Court
Disposed
Whether any adjudicatory body was approached
Yes
Name of the adjudicatory body
State Human Rights Commission
Name(s) of the Court(s)
Case Number
12462/CR/2023
Main Reasoning/Decision of court
Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:
Arrest/detention/imprisonment
Physical attack
Displacement
Lathicharge/teargas/pellets
Whether criminal law was used against protestors:
Yes
Reported Details of the Violation:
On 6th June 2024, hundreds of policemen along with demolition squads of BMC arrived in Jai Bhim Nagar to evict the residents. The residents claimed that the bouncers of Hiranandani builder had been harassing the locals for the past few days. On 6th June, the residents claimed that these bouncers started breaking into homes and attacking residents including children and women. This led to retaliation by locals. The locals formed a human chain holding photos of Dr. BR Ambedkar. The police, however, lathicharged and started beating the residents including women and children and trampling the images of Dr BR Ambedkar. This further escalated the violence leading to stone pelting. Amidst this stone pelting, the police were informed about a women resident, Asha Chaure, who was locked in a house and claimed that her life was under threat from the attacks by residents. The residents refuted this claim. However, the police conducted a rescue operation to protect her and this led to use of excessive force from police. The police filed charges against 200 people and arrested 61 people under 19 different sections of IPC including Section 324 and 326.
Date of Violation
June 5, 2024
Location of Violation
Powai
Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
PSUs Involved in the Conflict:
Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?
Yes
Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached
Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:
Lake View Developers
Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?
No
Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:
What was the action taken by the police?
How many people did the police detain or arrest?
What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?
Did the person face any violence while in police custody?
If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?
If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?
Legislation under which the accused was charged
Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?
In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?
Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?
Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?
Shubham is a housing rights activist based in Mumbai. He has a post graduate from the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai in urban policy and governance.
Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills
Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex
Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest
Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court
Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya
Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project
Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra
Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction