Goa
,
Mollem
,
North Goa
Published :
Apr 2023
|
Updated :
High Court stays work on concrete paver road through Goa's Mollem National Park
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2021
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2021
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Roads
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In August 2021, activists in Mollem, a South Goan village close to Bhagwan Mahaveer Sanctuary and Mollem National Park, opposed the construction of a concrete paver road cutting through the protected forest area. The proposed road was to be built from Collem to the Dudhsagar waterfall for improving access of tourists during monsoons. Currently, the kutcha or mud road is accessible only during the non-monsoon months.

Environmentalists say that all-weather access road will disallow regeneration of the forest and destroy its ecology. This is concerning to them because Mollem National Park [houses](https://guidetour.in/mollem-national-park/#:~:text=Biodiversity%3A The Western Ghats%2C of,birds%2C reptiles%2C and insects.) a vast range of flora and fauna in the Western Ghats, a site that is listed as a major biodiversity hotspot.

The proposal was presented to the State Board of Wild Life (SBWL) in a meeting on December 2, 2019. The Chief Wildlife Warden, during the meeting, stated that the road gets eroded during the rains, inconveniencing the visitors and causing “dust pollution” on either side of the road. The tender for laying interlocking pavers over a bed of cement concrete was awarded in July 2021.

Opposition to the road construction began when locals noticed bulldozers and heavy machinery carrying large quantities of rubble into the forest. The Goa Foundation, a non-governmental organisation, backed by villagers, wrote to the Chief Wildlife Warden Santosh Kumar to issue a stop work order and subsequently filed a Public Interest Litigation in the High Court. They claimed that the Public Works Department (PWD), which was carrying out the work, had not obtained required permissions under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

Speaking to a news outlet, Claude Alvares of Goa Foundation said that creating an all-weather access would facilitate a daily movement of 240 jeeps within the forest. "The project also includes construction of a toilet block, guard rooms, parking bays, and taxi stands," Om D’Costa, a litigator from Goa Foundation, told LCW.

In response, the representative for the state said that the Chief Wildlife Warden has been empowered to order such works under section 33 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. It was further pointed out that SBWL had granted approval to work relating to strengthening of existing road back in 2019. Finally, it added no new road was being constructed and that it was merely routine repair and maintenance work.

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court, in September 2021, restrained the Public Works Department from undertaking any construction till the petition has been disposed or the the department receives clearance from the National Board of Wild Life.

The court noted that documentary evidence and the cost of the project – approximately Rs 2.5 crore per kilometre – indicates that it is not merely routine repair work. The court also said that the project appears to cater to 4.5 lakh tourists that visit the falls instead of benefiting the sanctuary, adding that “demands of tourism must be subservient to and in consonance with the conservation interests of [Protected Area] PA.” The court however said that PWD could undertake usual repairs work on the road passing through the PA. D’Costa said “The PWD is complying with the order and construction work on the site has stopped. The matter has not come up since.”

As of April 2023 the matter continues to remain pending in the court.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

31

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2021

Page Number In Investment Document:

4

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Goa State Government, Public Works Department, Chief Wildlife Warden, National Wildlife Board, State Wildlife Board

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

M Assmas Constructions

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Goa Foundation

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Malavika Neurekar

Malavika graduated from Azim Premji University with a Master's in Development. She has worked as a journalist and has written for Hindustan Times, Scroll and Mint Lounge.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us