Chhattisgarh
Chahchad
,
Hahaladdi village
,
Kanker
Published :
Feb 2017
|
Updated :
Polluted Water from Bajrang Iron Ore Mine in Chhattisgarh Destroys Agricultural Fields
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
528
People affected
2016
Year started
77
Land area affected
Households affected
528
People Affected
2016
Year started
77
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Iron Ore Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The residents of Hahaladdi and Chahchad villages have opposed the operations of the Shri Bajrang Iron Ore Mine located in the reserve forest area of Durgkondal tehsil in Kanker district.  Their resistance to mining stems from concerns over its impact on the agricultural land and water resources in the region. In addition to this, a delay in offering compensation and employment by the company has fueled the public's discontentment.  After mining operations began in 2015, the people reported that the polluted water (ironrich water or 'lal paani', as they call it) draining from the mines entered their agricultural fields and affected the quality and quantity of their produce and in the long run, had started to turn the land barren.  In 2015, a delegation of affected villagers submitted a memorandum to demand employment that was promised to them, alongwith the construction of a drain for the dirty water. Additionally, the villagers demanded compensation for loss of access to the forest produce, which was their source of livelihood. But the administration was unresponsive.  In November 2016, the villagers, alongwith political leaders, submitted a memorandum to the district collector demanding to shut down the mine. They accused the company of illegal mining and reiterated their demands for employment and compensation. In December, the protesters held a march and blocked roads to reassert their complaints. Reportedly, the police arrested 155 protesters. Later, a delegation of villagers submitted a memorandum to the governor and threatened to intensify the agitation if the administration did not respond to their demands.  The villagers alleged that the company had employed people from outside villages instead of hiring them. They also claimed that the company did not fulfil many promises related to infrastructural development, afforestation, education and health services.  Meanwhile, the Naxalites in the state have also opposed the mine. Over the years, there have been multiple reports of aggression. In 2015, Naxalites burnt at least 20 vehicles used for mining operations. In another incident in 2017, Naxalites threatened the workers and called for a shutdown of the mine.   Other villages surrounding the mines have also joined the protests. While the company has not accounted for many of these villages as affected, their fields are rapidly degrading because of the dirty water and other mining activities.
In November 2020, the locals again took out a rally to reassert their demands for employment, clean drinking water and other basic amenities. They also raised voices for an environment protection plan and insurance for agricultural produce.   After six years of the start of mining operations, the villagers are still waiting for the government to deliver on their promises of compensation, employment and public infrastructure. In February 2021, a representative of the Gram Sabha visited the district collector to submit a memorandum restating their demands.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Demand for promised compensation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

4

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Directorate of Geology and Mining, Chhattisgarh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Shri Bajrang Metallics and Power Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Youth Wing of Indian National Congress

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Riddhi Pandey


Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand for employment

Demand for promised compensation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us