Assam
,
Guwahati
,
Kamrup (Metropolitan)
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
January 22, 2025
Hill residents in Guwahati demand land titles, Assam government vows to give ownership rights
Reported by
Abdul Kalam Azad
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
85000
Households affected
316320
People affected
2002
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
85000
Households affected
316320
People Affected
2002
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Guwahati, the biggest city in the northeast, has been expanding rapidly since the 1970s. As new administrative government jobs began to be generated, and the informal sector started booming, poor growth in the agricultural sector and annual floods and land erosion pushed a large number of people from across the state to move to Guwahati in search of better livelihood opportunities.

After the liberalisation of the economy in the 1990s, Guwahati witnessed another phase of expansion. Corporate and business classes emerged in the city, so did new roads, buildings and other infrastructure. Owing to the huge influx of people, the city faced an acute shortage of housing. According to reports, land in hills and wetlands around the city were illegally occupied by businessmen and government officials. In many cases, the government reportedly gave such land to public and private institutions.

The people living in the hills and around wetlands in Guwahati soon started demanding land titles from the government. But the state launched eviction drives in 2002 and displaced thousands of people living in the hills. Local organisations such as Krishak Mukti Sangam Samiti (KMSS) and Unnayan Samiti have held several protests. The government even formed a committee to look into the matter under the leadership of the then revenue minister, Bhumidhar Barman, but nothing concrete happened.

According to a survey by AC Nielsen in 2009, around 65,900 households were then residing in 16 hill settlements. Some 71 per cent of all households were living on government land, while around 18 per cent were living on land that was part of reserve forest. About 7.3 per cent households lived on _patta _land owned by others, while some 3.6 per cent households were living on their own land.

On 22 June 2011, thousands of hill dwellers [marched ](http://on june 22, 2011, thousands of hill dwellers marched to dispur demanding that the evictions be stopped and pattas be granted to those living on dakhal (encroached) lands/)to the secretariat in Dispur demanding a stop to the evictions and land titles to the people. But the police resorted to lathicharge and fired tear-gas shells to disperse the demonstrators, many of whom were injured. This was followed by police firing, in which three persons were killed, including a nine-year old boy. In retaliation, the people beat up police personnel and damaged vehicles.

In 2014, another round of eviction drive started and saw widespread protests by people. The KMSS organised a protest meeting at Digahalipukhuri in the city on 18 February 2014, and prepared a list of demands, including legal ownership rights to those living in the hills and around wetlands. In a separate incident, a member of the KMSS, Pronob Boro, self-immolated in front of the state secretariat in Dispur.

There has not been much headway since. The current government has been sending notices to the hill dwellers, through the state revenue department, asking them to vacate the encroached land.

In a report by Reuters, the hill dwellers have still not got land titles as of March 2020. According to a farmer, the authorities have said that they would first survey the land, check proof of residence and issue _pattas _to those who are eligible. "But that has not happened, and without a _patta, _we can be evicted any time," the farmer said.

In April 2022, the government of Assam announced that ownership rights will be given to people residing in Guwahati hills, government grazing reserve lands and Debuttar government lands in the city.

Eventually, in October 2024, the Assam government reduced land premiums for residents of Guwahati's hill areas as part of the Government scheme named Mission Basundhara 3.0 initiative. As cited by the Assam Chief Minister, this effort was aimed to simplify land ownership processes and offer financial relief to marginalized hill dwellers by reducing land premiums, reflecting the government's focus on inclusive land reform policies. The development is expected to benefit numerous indigenous families residing on the 19 hills of Guwahati who have been struggling to secure their land rights for decades. However, reacting to the CM's statement, president of Bhumi Adhikar Sangram Samiti, Pranab Jyoti Kalita, informed the media that no guidelines have been issued by the government.

Notably, illegal encroachments and unregulated hill cutting in Guwahati have increased landslide risks and environmental harm. Despite warnings in the Master Plan, rising housing demands and poor planning perpetuate these issues and collaborative action is crucial to protect the hills.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other environmental services, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

2024

Why did the conflict end?

In April 2022, the government of Assam announced that ownership rights will be given to people residing in Guwahati hills, government grazing reserve lands and Debuttar government lands in the city.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Forest and Environment, Department of Revenue, Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority, Office of the Deputy Commissioner Kamrup (Metro)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Abdul Kalam Azad
Show more work
Latest updates
Ukhrul, Kamjong, Tengnoupal, Chandel
Manipur

Several mining agreements in Manipur granted without villagers' consent, environmental clearances

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat farmers oppose land acquisition for Kodinar-Somnath railway project

Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Dima Hasao
Assam

Environmental Devastation and Human Fatalities: The Crisis of Illegal Coal Mining in Dima Hasao's Abandoned Mines

South Goa
Goa

In water-stressed Sancoale, locals protest Bhutani project with 700 swimming pools

Gir Somanath
Gujarat

Gujarat puts solar power project near Gir sanctuary on hold amid protest

Dimapur
Nagaland

Global Naga Forum calls for relocation of Assam Rifles camps from urban areas

Dimapur
Nagaland

DNSU demands relocation of sub-centre in GMC Midland

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other environmental services, Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us