Assam
,
Guwahati
,
Kamrup
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Hill Residents in Guwahati Demand Land Titles, Assam Government Resorts to Evictions
Reported by
Abdul Kalam Azad
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
65900
Households affected
316320
People affected
2002
Year started
Land area affected
65900
Households affected
316320
People Affected
2002
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Guwahati, the biggest city in the northeast, has been expanding rapidly since the 1970s. As new administrative government jobs began to be generated, and the informal sector started booming, poor growth in the agricultural sector and annual floods and land erosion pushed a large number of people from across the state to move to Guwahati in search of better livelihood opportunities.
After the liberalisation of the economy in the 1990s, Guwahati witnessed another phase of expansion. Corporate and business classes emerged in the city, so did new roads, buildings and other infrastructure. Owing to the huge influx of people, the city faced an acute shortage of housing. According to reports, land in hills and wetlands around the city were illegally occupied by businessmen and government officials. In many cases, the government reportedly gave such land to public and private institutions.
The people living in the hills and around wetlands in Guwahati soon started demanding land titles from the government. But the state launched eviction drives in 2002 and displaced thousands of people living in the hills. Local organisations such as Krishak Mukti Sangam Samiti (KMSS) and Unnayan Samiti have held several protests. The government even formed a committee to look into the matter under the leadership of the then revenue minister, Bhumidhar Barman, but nothing concrete happened.
According to a survey by AC Nielsen in 2009, around 65,900 households were then residing in 16 hill settlements. Some 71 per cent of all households were living on government land, while around 18 per cent were living on land that was part of reserve forest. About 7.3 per cent households lived on _patta _land owned by others, while some 3.6 per cent households were living on their own land.
On June 22, 2011, thousands of hill dwellers marched to the secretariat in Dispur demanding a stop to the evictions and land titles to the people. But the police resorted to lathicharge and fired tear-gas shells to disperse the demonstrators, many of whom were injured. This was followed by police firing, in which three persons were killed, including a nine-year old boy. In retaliation, the people beat up police personnel and damaged vehicles.
In 2014, another round of eviction drive started and saw widespread protests by people. The KMSS organised a protest meeting at Digahalipukhuri in the city on February 18, 2014, and prepared a list of demands, including legal ownership rights to those living in the hills and around wetlands. In a separate incident, a member of the KMSS, Pronob Boro, self-immolated in front of the state secretariat in Dispur.
There has not been much headway since. The current government has been sending notices to the hill dwellers, through the state revenue department, asking them to vacate the encroached land.
In a report by Reuters, the hill dwellers have still not got land titles as of March 2020. According to a farmer, the authorities have said that they would first survey the land, check proof of residence and issue _pattas _to those who are eligible. "But that has not happened, and without a _patta, _we can be evicted any time," the farmer said.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Department of Forest and Environment, Department of Revenue, Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Abdul Kalam Azad
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us