Jammu and Kashmir
,
Rajori, Kathua, Poonch, Samba and Udhampur
,
Jammu
Published :
Mar 2017
|
Updated :
Nomadic Gujjars and Bakerwals Face Eviction Drives in Jammu
Reported by
Athar Parvaiz
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2014
Year started
13000
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2014
Year started
13000
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The forest department of the erstwhile state, Jammu and Kashmir, under the BJPPDP alliance, initiated an antiencroachment drive in Rajori, Kathua and Poonch districts in Jammu province since 2014, asking GujjarBakerwal families to vacate land under their possession. The GujjarBakerwal's are nomadic grazers who primarily practice migratory livestock rearing. Economically marginalized, they have often been scapegoats for communal politics on account of being Muslim in Jammu a Hindu majority region of the erstwhile Jammu and Kashmir. The government, in 2015, alleged that the tribe had encroached upon 13,000ha of forestland, which rightfully belonged to the forest department. In lieu of the order passed by the Forest Minister, several huts of Gujjars in Kalakote area of Rajouri were demolished. The Gujjars decried this, highlighting that they have been living in the forests since 1947. Even as the community were assure that the matter was going to be taken up by the then Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti, by 2016, the community received no substantive response and in October, 2016, it was reported that the forest department razed 15 huts in the Sundarbani area of Rajouri. Additionally, in 2017, a madrassa (Islamic educational centers) was bulldozed by the Jammu Development Authority, in Ramban district, leading to protests and violent clashes. Further, on January 14, 2019, the BJP's Jammu and Kashmir unit requested the state's Governor to order an enquiry to identify those who misused the Roshni Act, to acquire hundreds of kanals (one kanal is equal to 0.125 acres) of state land. The Act, which was passed in 2001, enables the transfer of ownership rights of state land to its occupants, subject to a cost as determined by the government. However, the Act was repealed in November 2018, leading to widespread anxiety and despair among the Gujjars, who remarked that it was a severe blow to their hope of being able to purchase land and what seemed to be their last measure of protection against encroachment drives. The tribe had been demanding the implementation of the central The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, in the erstwhile state, which would endow them with individual and community rights over forestland and its resources. On August, 2019, in lieu of the abrogation of article 370, central laws were extended to Jammu and Kashmir. However, as was reported on 20 December, 2020, the nomadic community was yet to benefit from the Forest Rights Act, 2006 as well as the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act. In fact, as per the report, demolition drives were conducted in the previous month itself.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

J&K Forest Department, Jammu Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Athar Parvaiz
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us