Gujarat
,
Gandhidham
,
Kutch
Published :
Jan 2019
|
Updated :
Gujarat Traders Organise Rally, Demand Relaxation in Land Ownership Rules in Gandhidham
Reported by
Aditi Patil
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
30000
People affected
2018
Year started
13760
Land area affected
Households affected
30000
People Affected
2018
Year started
13760
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Traders and businessmen of Gandhidham took out a rally in the town on December 7, 2018, demanding the lifting of restrictions on land ownership that they believe are hindering development. The rally was backed by 124 local associations. With the continuous development of the Deendayal Port and the inauguration of Adani's Tuna Tekra terminal three years ago, trade and industry in and around Gandhidham have flourished. This has led to an increased demand for land in the area. However, restrictions on transfer fees, mortgage, etc. make land purchase burdensome, in addition to keeping the land prices artificially high. To protest this, in December 2018, traders and businessmen in Gandhidham marched to the office of the Deendayal Port Trust (DPT) under the banner of Gandhidham Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) and submitted a memorandum in which they demanded a reduction in the mortgage and transfer fees as well as a conversion of leasehold land into freehold land in the town. The GCCI also demanded that commercial and industrial land, which is currently leasehold land, should be converted into freehold land so that land and property holders become their true owners. The ruler of erstwhile Kutch state had allotted 30,000 acres of land to the Union government for the development of the Deendayal Port and the GandhidhamAdipur twin towns to rehabilitate members of the Sindhi community who had migrated to Kutch after Partition in 1947. Presently, DPT, a trust functioning under the Union Ministry of Shipping, controls around 30,000 acres of land, while the Sindhu Resettlement Corporation (SRC) controls around 4,000 acres. The DPT and SRC lease plots of land to individuals and businesses for development and collect lease rents from them. If the holder of such a lease plot transfers that plot to another party, the DPT charges a transfer fee. Similarly, the DPT also collects a mortgage fee from plot holders who mortgage their property for the purpose of availing bank loans etc. Nimish Phadke, managing director of the Federation of Kutch Industries Association, said that during 1947, the charges and fees were just a token. "Now, Kandla is one of the major ports of India and the land parcel is quite valuable. Since the port trust owns the land now, it does not want to hand it over. It may want to hold on to it for future expansion," he added. During the protest, the DPT chairperson announced that the demands of the traders' body were under consideration. In March 2020, DPT proposed revision of the rate structure to the Tariff Authority for Major Ports, suggesting a two per cent increase in lease rent of all land except those falling under the categories of A, D3, D4 and G1, and it was approved by the authority in January 2021. However, GCCI has opposed it, stating that the pandemic has not been taken into consideration in the land valuation and that the categorisation of land is being done arbitrarily.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for lease-hold land to be converted into freehold land

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Union Ministry of Shipping, Indian Ports Association, Deendayal Port Trust, Sindhu Resettlement Corporation

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Gandhidham Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Aditi Patil

Aditi is a freelance development researcher. She has a Master’s in Development Studies from the Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India. She has previously worked with WWF India on forest-based livelihoods and international wildlife trade. She has also worked on the Forest Rights Act in Dangs district in Gujarat. Her paper, “Forest-based livelihoods, Malki practice and Forest Rights Act in Gujarat: The case of Adivasis in the Dangs,” has been published in the book, Adivasis in India: Livelihoods, Resources and Institutions, by Bloomsbury India.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us