Haryana
,
Gorakhpur
,
Fatehabad
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
December 19, 2025
Land acquisition, commons, and environmental contestation in the Gorakhpur nuclear power project, Haryana
Reported by
Surabhi Bhandari
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
846
Households affected
4060
People affected
2010
Year started
607.04
ha.
Land area affected
846
Households affected
4060
People Affected
2010
Year started
607.04
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Nuclear Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Unclassifed
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Nuclear Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2010, a nuclear power plant was proposed at Gorakhpur village in Haryana's Fatehabad district. For the project, the government had to acquire 1,400 acres (three villages), which included private as well as common land. After agitating for two years, farmers of all the villages gave up their land in early 2016. However, common grazing land, where residential complex for staff of the plant had to come up, became a matter of conflict.

The villagers challenged the takeover of this common land in the National Green Tribunal. They argued that the wildlife in the region including blackbucks will be affected with the project. Furthermore, the affected people alleged that they were paid lesser compensation than what was promised during land acquisition. They are also demanding for jobs promised in the plant.

In June 2018, Haryana government decided to relocate the residential complex and gave 194 acres of land in Agroha town to Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), union government's project implementing agency. In September 2018, the NGT ruled against the demands of the villagers.

In January 2019, site excavation works started and according to the government, the first phase of the plant was expected to commence operations in 2025.

The villagers approached the Haryana and Punjab High Court arguing that the state government did not provided them with the promised jobs. In September 2020, the court directed the state government to provide the jobs in three months.

In March 2021, NGT dismissed a review petition against its previous order filed by Akhil Bhartiya Jeev Raksha Bishnoi Sabha (ABJRBS), an environment conservation organisation. "We have challenged the NGT order in Supreme Court," said Vinod of ABJRBS. Stating that the conflict is ongoing, Vinod said: "Many project affected families are being denied jobs in the nuclear plant and the wildlife in the region is still under threat as NPCIL did not come up with a conservation plan for the region it acquired."

In 2021, the NPCIL announced that it would spend Rs 1.35 crore under its corporate social responsibility initiative to develop a community reserve area for the protection of endangered species of blackbucks and soft-shell turtles in Dhangar and Kajlaheri villages. 

In July 2023, Haryana Forest and Environment Minister Kanwar Pal announced that the land of NPCIL in Fatehabad district would be acquired to conserve blackbucks in the state. "It was informed that a land dispute related to the project had been settled and the land would soon be transferred from the Rural Development and Panchayats Department to the Forest Research Institute," the Tribune reported in 2023.

In April 2023, while the project was ongoing, the villagers had also protested against the discharge of underground water into the Bhakra Main Line (BML) canal. The villagers claimed that the water being released by the nuclear plant was salty in nature, harmful, especially as it was being used for drinking purposes. The villagers had also filed a formal complaint with the district administration, stating that salty underground water may cause health issues in people. 
 
These allegations were denied by NPCIL officials. “We are not discharging enough water to disturb the water quality of the Bhakra canal,” an official told The Indian Express. The concerns of the villagers were termed baseless by the authorities. 

The work for the nuclear plant, said to generate 2,800 MW of electricity, is still underway. It was originally supposed to be completed by 2028, but was delayed by the conflict. Earlier this year, Union Power Minister Manohar Lal Khattar, accompanied by Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini, visited the Gorakhpur Nuclear Power Plant site in Fatehabad district and announced that despite delays, the long-pending project is underway, with two of its four units expected to be commissioned by 2031 and the remaining two by 2032, The Tribune reported. 

Talking to Land Conflict Watch, Vinod Karwasara Bishnoi, president of the Haryana Unit of Akhil Bhartiya Jeev Raksha Bishnoi Sabha (ABJRBS), an environmental conservation organisation, said, “There have been no protests in the last five years, and the work for the nuclear plant is undergoing.” Bishnoi also mentioned that while the government has taken action toward wildlife conservation during the setting up of the nuclear plant after protests, villagers are still unaware of the kind of jobs they can get. “The NPCIL is outsourcing for positions, but the youth are not trained in this kind of work,” he said.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for employment

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2028

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

23502

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2010

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

2021

Why did the conflict end?

After the village residents protested the takeover of common land in the National Green Tribunal, stating that the wildlife in the region would be affected, in June 2018, the Haryana government decided to relocate the residential complex that was to be built on that land to Agroha Town. In September 2018, the NGT ruled against the other demands of the villagers, including the land compensation and jobs promised. In 2019, site excavation works had started. Following that, the villagers also approached the Haryana and Punjab High Court, arguing that the state government did not provide them with the promised jobs. In September 2020, the court directed the state government to provide jobs in three months. In March 2021, NGT dismissed a review petition against its previous order filed by Akhil Bhartiya Jeev Raksha Bishnoi Sabha (ABJRBS), an environmental conservation organisation. "We have challenged the NGT order in the Supreme Court," said Vinod of ABJRBS. In 2021, the NPCIL said it would spend Rs 1.35 crore under the corporate social responsibility to develop a community reserve area for the protection of engendered species of blackbucks and soft-shell turtles in Dhangar and Kajlaheri villages. In July 2023, Haryana Forest and Environment Minister Kanwar Pal said the land of Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) in Fatehabad district will be acquired in order to conserve blackbucks in the state. "It was informed that a land dispute related to the project had been settled and the land would soon be transferred from the Rural Development and Panchayats Department to the Forest Research Institute," the Tribune reported in 2023. According to Vinod Karwasara Bishnoi, president of the Haryana Unit of Akhil Bhartiya Jeev Raksha Bishnoi Sabha (ABJRBS), there have been no more protests in the past five years, and the work for the nuclear plant is underway. The project, which was projected to be finished by 2028, but was delayed by the conflict, is now set to finish by 2032.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Union Government, Governemnt of Haryana

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local Villagers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Surabhi Bhandari
Show more work
Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for employment

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2028

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us