Goa
Tiswadi Taluka
,
Bainguinim
,
North Goa
Published :
Jul 2022
|
Updated :
Goans in Bainguinim oppose waste management plant; demand relocation of project
Reported by
Maitreya Ghorpade
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
1010
Households affected
People affected
2019
Year started
171
Land area affected
1010
Households affected
People Affected
2019
Year started
171
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Waste Management
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Goa Waste Management Corporation’s (GWMC) proposal to construct a 250 Tonne Per Day (TPD) Solid Waste Management Facility (SWMF) in Bainguinim Village of Goa has led to protests by local communities who are opposing the project.

The Rs. 169.17 Crore project is planned across a 17 Ha. plot which was [acquired](https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/state-to-float-fresh-tender-for-bainguinim-waste-plant/articleshow/90807850.cms#:~:text=In 2008%2C) by the Corporation of City of Panaji in 2008, and handed over to GWMC in 2017, who are responsible for the project's planning and execution. As per its Environment Impact Assessment Report, the [project aims](http://goaspcb.gov.in/Media/Default/Public Hearing/GWMC/Bainguinim Goa Final EIA Report.pdf) to ensure “the scientific processing and disposal of the solid waste by the local bodies in compliance with the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Rules, 2016.”

While protest marches attended by thousands of Goa locals against utilising the acquired land for a SWMF were first carried out in 2013, the people’s movement intensified in 2020, when GWMC’s 250 TPD project was [granted](http://dstegoa.gov.in/Bainguinim EC.pdf) environmental clearance. Primarily, the opposition to the waste management facility has been due its proximity to several residential complexes cumulatively housing over 1000 apartments, many of whom share a common boundary wall with the project.

The Pornem Goemch Nagrik Monch and Bainguinim Citizens Forum have been leading the movement against the project, with participation of local Congress Party leadership. Speaking to LCW, Silverio Diaz, Secretary, Bainguinim Citizens Forum stated: “The proposed land is in violation of the siting criteria as set out in Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, the Amended Guidelines on the Provision of Buffer Zone Around Waste Processing and Disposal Facilities, 2019. Further, even if the facility uses the best technology for processing waste, we fear that for a 250 TPD plant there will be a long line of trucks carrying wet waste from various locations.The plant and its premises will turn into a breeding ground for vermin, pests and other disease causing vectors which will pose a greater threat to the lives of people within the proximity of the proposed land.”

The citizens’ key demand is to shift the project from its current location as they fear adverse health impacts for those living in residential apartments that are located close to the project site. Citizens also fear that the stench of garbage will adversely impact the children whose school premises are located within 300 metres from the SWMF boundary.

Another major concern of the locals is the damaging effect of a waste management facility on the closely-situated Goan heritage sites, a concern that has been echoed by the Goa Roman Catholic Church as well.

A GWMC official who spoke to LCW on the condition of anonymity, said the project “will not create pollution, (as) it is a waste management plant which is there for the scientific management of waste.”
A petition filed by the Bainguinim Citizens Forum challenging the environmental clearance granted for the SWMF was dismissed by the National Green Tribunal in September 2020. A civil appeal against the NGT order was filed in the Supreme Court in 2021 by Bainguinim Citizens Forum. This case is still pending in the apex Court. But protests have restarted on ground since June 2022.  

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to relocate the project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

169.17

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2019

Page Number In Investment Document:

31

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Goa Town and Country Planning Department

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Goa Waste Management Corporation

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Bainguinim Citizens Forum; Pornem Goemch Nagrik Monch

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Maitreya Prithwiraj Ghorpade

Maitreya is an independent environmental law practitioner having secured a B.A.LL.B. (Hons) from Hidayatullah National Law University.

Initiating his legal practice at the chambers of ex-President of the NGT Western Zone Bar Association Adv. Asim Sarode, Maitreya has gone on to work with the 2021 Right Livelihood awardee 'Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment' (LIFE) before commencing independent environmental law practice before various benches of the National Green Tribunal in 2022.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us