Tamil Nadu
,
Kovalam
,
Kanyakumari
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
November 19, 2024
Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk
Reported by
Sumana
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
100000
People affected
2016
Year started
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
100000
People Affected
2016
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Port
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In 2016, the Centre proposed to build a container terminal at Enayam village in Kanyakumari district of Tamil Nadu. The port, to be constructed at an estimated cost of Rs 27,570 crore, aims to tap into the sea traffic between Europe and Asia and is part of the 'Sagarmala' Plan to have a string of ports across the country.

The port has a controversial history. It started as a fishing harbour in Colachel, then was expanded into a transhipment harbour, and later shifted to Enayam, a fishing village near Colachel. Following protests, the port was moved to an area between Keelamanakudi and Kovalam villages near Kanniyakumari. Members of fishing communities in these areas were concerned about the effects the port would have on their livelihood, as it could destroy the marine biodiversity in the area.

On 12 January 2018, fisherfolk around Kovalam village observed a fast to protest the construction of the port.

On 26 August 2020, LCW contacted lawyer Stanley Casmic Sundar, who said that the government hasn't followed up on the project since 2018, and seems to have dropped it.

According to a report dated February 2021, the government is making fresh attempts to build a port in the same area and claim that this will not lead to displacement because there are no fishing villages in the identified land.

The[ proposed expansion](https://sagarmala.gov.in/sites/default/files/MIV 2030 Report.pdf) of Kanyakumari Port, part of India’s ambitious Maritime India Vision 2030 (MIV-2030) plan, has triggered opposition from local communities and environmentalists. The project, aimed at transforming the region into a significant shipping hub, involves expanding port infrastructure to accommodate larger vessels and increased cargo volumes. However, the expansion has raised alarms over potential displacement of fishing communities, coastal erosion, and damage to marine ecosystems.

As part of the MIV-2030 blueprint, the government seeks to enhance port infrastructure to reduce India’s dependency on foreign ports for transshipment—a critical process in global shipping where large cargo ships unload and transfer containers to smaller ships bound for regional destinations. Despite these efforts, a large proportion of India’s transshipped cargo continues to be handled by foreign ports, particularly in Sri Lanka, Singapore, and the Middle East. This reliance on external ports has been a key driver behind the push for new port developments, including Kanyakumari.

Local fishermen and environmental groups argue that the expansion caters more to international shipping needs than addressing local concerns. They fear that the project could lead to significant land loss and disruption of their livelihoods, which are deeply dependent on the coastal waters. There is also concern over the lack of adequate compensation and consultation with affected communities, who have been holding protests against the expansion.

The Kanyakumari Port expansion exemplifies the growing tensions between large-scale infrastructure development under national policies like MIV-2030 and the rights of coastal communities. As India strives to become a major player in global maritime trade, balancing industrial growth with sustainable development and local interests remains a critical challenge.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Scrapping of the Project

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2030

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

27570

Type of investment:

Investment Expected

Year of Estimation

2016

Page Number In Investment Document:

5

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Tuticorin Port Trust

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

V. O. Chidambaranar Port Trust

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

People's Movement Against Enayam International Container Transhipment Terminal

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Sumana
Show more work
Latest updates
Surendranagar
Gujarat

Protests against solar power plant in Dhrangadhra’s Moti Malvan village in Gujarat

Tiruvannamalai
Tamil Nadu

Farmers protest new SIPCOT industrial complex project in Tamil Nadu's Thiruvannamalai

Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers demand compensation for land diverted for thermal power plant in Vishakhapatnam

Nainital
Uttarakhand

6 killed in Haldwani amid protest over demolition of mosque and madrasa

Pune
Maharashtra

Pune residents protest felling of trees for transit corridor, fear groundwater contamination

North Delhi
Delhi

DDA razes down encroachments near Azadpur Mandi in Delhi, 250 families rendered homeless

North West Delhi
Delhi

Residents of Delhi's Shakur Basti continue to live in fear of demolition

Jalgaon
Maharashtra

Farmers in Maharashtra's Jalgaon allege 1100 acres fraudulently acquired by solar power companies

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2030

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Non-agri rural enterprise, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Water bodies

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us