Gujarat
,
Surat
,
Surat
Published : 12 July, 2014   |   Last updated - 24 Jun, 2024
Farmers protest against 765 KV power transmission line in Surat
Reported by
Suchak Patel
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Updated by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Transmission Lines
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Surat, farmers have been vehemently protesting against a new 765 KV power transmission line being laid by the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited. Stating that they have already lost fertile agricultural land to highways, expressways, and bullet trains, the farmers are determined to not give their land for the power line project.

The new power line is being laid from Khavda in Kutch to Vansi Borsi in Navsari via Surat. In May, Power Corporation officials started survey operations in Mandvi and Palsana talukas of Surat district without informing the farmers, kickstarting the protests. In June, farmers from Mangarol, Mandvi, Kamrej, Bardoli and Palsana talukas of Surat district protested outside the Collector's office, raising the slogan 'jan denge zamini nahi' (we will give our lives but not land).

Parimal Patel, President of the Surat District Farmers' Association, stated that the power line is set to cut through fertile farmland, exacerbating past land losses due to other infrastructure projects. According to a report by the Navgujarat Samachar, the new power line involves erecting towers on 85-foot by 85-foot plots. Farmers are demanding that the power lines be laid underground in urban areas or along the Gujarat coast.

The process of acquiring land for power lines differs significantly from that for highways. During the expressway construction, farmers received compensation for their land. However, the Telegraph Act of 1885, still used for power line projects, provide very less compensation or benefits to farmers. This outdated Act was initially meant for telephone poles, which had minimal impact on agriculture.

Jayesh Patel, President of Gujarat Khedut Samaj, expressed his concerns, saying, "We don't understand how this government is erecting electricity towers by misinterpreting the Telegraph Act meant for communication." He also pointed out that the Electricity Act of 2003 has been misinterpreted, leading to the oppression of farmers and the potential ruin of fertile land.

Meanwhile, farmers alleged that company staff forcibly entered their fields without permission and damaged their crops. While the Power Grid Corporation is said to have issued notices to farmers, the latter claims that the company has not given any information about the project and how many farmers will be affected by this power line.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Farmers are demanding that the power lines be laid underground in urban areas or along the Gujarat coast.

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Private

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Author
Reported by
Suchak Patel

Gujarat

Kumar Sambhav is a social entrepreneur and award-winning journalist, leading innovative research in accountability investigations. He is the founder of Land Conflict Watch and is currently working as India Research Lead with Princeton University’s Digital Witness Lab.

Read More

Latest updates
Gujarat
Gujarat

Amid protest, Gujarat scraps Par-Tapi-Narmada river-linking project

Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh

Protests by Kinnauri tribes halt hydro electric project in Himachal Pradesh

Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu

Villagers oppose greenfield airport for Chennai in Parandur, Tamil Nadu

Himachal Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh

Landowners affected by Renukaji dam project await fair compensation

Arunachal Pradesh
Arunachal Pradesh

Hydroelectric projects on Subansiri river continue despite public outcry, disasters, and persistent floods

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers divided over Mandal-Becharaji Special Investment region in Gujarat

Gujarat
Gujarat

Farmers protest against GIDC in Gujarat, demand promised jobs, compensation

Goa
Goa

Proposed construction in Goa village blocks residents' access to agricultural fields, river

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Farmers protest against 765 KV power transmission line in Surat

Reported by

Suchak Patel

Legal Review by

Anmol Gupta

Edited by

Anupa Sagar Kujur

Updated by

Updated by

Published on

July 16, 2024

July 31, 2024

Edited on

July 16, 2024

Sector

Power

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Transmission Lines

Starting Year

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Households Affected by Conflict

People Affected by Conflict

State

Gujarat

Sector

Power

People Affected by Conflict

Households Affected by Conflict

Land Area Affected (in Hectares)

ha

Starting Year

Location of Conflict

Surat

Surat

Reason or Cause of Conflict

Transmission Lines

Land Conflict Summary

In Surat, farmers have been vehemently protesting against a new 765 KV power transmission line being laid by the Power Grid Corporation of India Limited. Stating that they have already lost fertile agricultural land to highways, expressways, and bullet trains, the farmers are determined to not give their land for the power line project.

The new power line is being laid from Khavda in Kutch to Vansi Borsi in Navsari via Surat. In May, Power Corporation officials started survey operations in Mandvi and Palsana talukas of Surat district without informing the farmers, kickstarting the protests. In June, farmers from Mangarol, Mandvi, Kamrej, Bardoli and Palsana talukas of Surat district protested outside the Collector's office, raising the slogan 'jan denge zamini nahi' (we will give our lives but not land).

Parimal Patel, President of the Surat District Farmers' Association, stated that the power line is set to cut through fertile farmland, exacerbating past land losses due to other infrastructure projects. According to a report by the Navgujarat Samachar, the new power line involves erecting towers on 85-foot by 85-foot plots. Farmers are demanding that the power lines be laid underground in urban areas or along the Gujarat coast.

The process of acquiring land for power lines differs significantly from that for highways. During the expressway construction, farmers received compensation for their land. However, the Telegraph Act of 1885, still used for power line projects, provide very less compensation or benefits to farmers. This outdated Act was initially meant for telephone poles, which had minimal impact on agriculture.

Jayesh Patel, President of Gujarat Khedut Samaj, expressed his concerns, saying, "We don't understand how this government is erecting electricity towers by misinterpreting the Telegraph Act meant for communication." He also pointed out that the Electricity Act of 2003 has been misinterpreted, leading to the oppression of farmers and the potential ruin of fertile land.

Meanwhile, farmers alleged that company staff forcibly entered their fields without permission and damaged their crops. While the Power Grid Corporation is said to have issued notices to farmers, the latter claims that the company has not given any information about the project and how many farmers will be affected by this power line.

Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Farmers are demanding that the power lines be laid underground in urban areas or along the Gujarat coast.

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Private

Type of Common Land

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

Legal Data

Categories of Legislations Involved in the Conflict

Legislations/Policies Involved

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013
Section 105 [This section provides for acquisition taking place under certain Central acts to be exempt from the process under the Act, provided that compensation is provided in accordance with the First Schedule, rehabilitation is carried out as per the Second Schedule and infrastructure amenities are provided as per the Third Schedule]; The Fourth Schedule [This schedule exempts the Electricity Act, 2003, from the application of the Act]
Electricity Act, 2003
Section 67(3) [This section requires that the licensee laying down electric supply lines must do as minimal damage to the landowner's land and make full payment of compensation to persons affected by work carried out] Section 163 [A licensee duly authorised may at a reasonable time and on informing the landowner of their intention, enter any premises where electricity is being supplied for the purpose of inspection, testing, repair, etc.]
  1. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  2. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  3. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  4. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  5. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  6. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

  7. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

    Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Whether claims/objections were made as per procedure in the relevant statute

What was the claim(s)/objection(s) raised by the community?

What was the Decision of the Concerned Government Department?

Legal Processes and Loopholes Enabling the Conflict:

Non-consultation with stakeholders

Use of old/outdated laws

Legal Status:

Out of Court

Status of Case In Court

Whether any adjudicatory body was approached

No

Name of the adjudicatory body

Name(s) of the Court(s)

Case Number

Main Reasoning/Decision of court

Major Human Rights Violations Related to the Conflict:

No items found.

Reported Details of the Violation:

Date of Violation

Location of Violation

Additional Information

Nature of Protest

No items found.

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

No items found.

Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Resources

Resources Related to Conflict

  • News Articles Related to the Conflict:
  • Documents Related to the Conflict:
  • Links Related to the Conflict:

Images

Image Credit:  

Image Credit:  

Video

Other Land Conflicts in Gujarat

cross
    Not a member yet?
    Sign up now