Odisha
,
Rayagada
,
Rayagada
Published :
Feb 2021
|
Updated :
Employees of Sugar Company in Odisha Demand Land Promised 50 Years Ago
Reported by
Shazia Nigar
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
1440
People affected
Year started
318
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
1440
People Affected
Year started
318
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Other Kind of Industry
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban and Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Former employees of the Jeypore Sugar Company (JSC), who had paid a deposit for residential plots spread over 787 acres of land in Rayagada, are demanding that the stipulated land be allotted to them. They have also demanded that a part of the unused land should be used for developing civic amenities. JSC was set up in 1936 and attracted migrant workers from other districts. In 1971, 300 employees of the company deposited INR 300 each for residential plots that the company promised to allot to them. However, JSC became dysfunctional in the 1980s, and the employees did not get their due. Despite repeated attempts stretching over decades, during which many of the former employees died, JSC has been unresponsive to the demand for housing. In 1992, the Revenue Officer of Rayagada had instructed JSC to return 507 acres to its former employees under the Land Ceiling Act. The JSC appealed to the subdivisional magistrate and additional district magistrate, and both the authorities upheld the Revenue Officers order. JSC then took the matter to the Orissa High Court, where the case is pending. In June 2019, family members of the former employees organised themselves as the Retired Employees Union and staged a blockade in front of the JSC office reiterating their demand for housing allotment. Prior to the protest, the Union members had unsuccessfully tried to meet the JSC managing director in Chennai. The Union had also staged a peaceful protest outside the gates of the defunct JSC factory. Rayagada tehsildar Umashankar Sahu met the protesters and promised to take up the issue with the Advocate General of the Orissa High Court for further action. Apart from the lack of response from the JSC, the conflict is complicated by the stand of the queen of Jeypore, who claims that the land in question belongs to the royal family. The queen told the media that the land was leased out to JSC, which fraudulently made the Record of Rights in its name in connivance with the state revenue authorities. The royal family is preparing for a legal battle and is willing to distribute the land for both civic amenities and housing for JSCs former employees.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised land

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised housing

Region Classification

Urban and Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Rayagada Revenue Office

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Jeypore Sugar Company

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Shazia Nigar
Show more work
Latest updates
Surendranagar
Gujarat

Protests against solar power plant in Dhrangadhra’s Moti Malvan village in Gujarat

Tiruvannamalai
Tamil Nadu

Farmers protest new SIPCOT industrial complex project in Tamil Nadu's Thiruvannamalai

Visakhapatnam
Andhra Pradesh

Farmers demand compensation for land diverted for thermal power plant in Vishakhapatnam

Nainital
Uttarakhand

6 killed in Haldwani amid protest over demolition of mosque and madrasa

Pune
Maharashtra

Pune residents protest felling of trees for transit corridor, fear groundwater contamination

North Delhi
Delhi

DDA razes down encroachments near Azadpur Mandi in Delhi, 250 families rendered homeless

North West Delhi
Delhi

Residents of Delhi's Shakur Basti continue to live in fear of demolition

Jalgaon
Maharashtra

Farmers in Maharashtra's Jalgaon allege 1100 acres fraudulently acquired by solar power companies

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for promised land

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us