Andhra Pradesh
,
Gannavaram
,
Krishna
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
January 21, 2025
AP farmers unhappy over land acquisition for Vijaywada airport expansion, demand resettlement
Reported by
Rahul Maganti
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
423
Households affected
2030
People affected
2016
Year started
187
ha.
Land area affected
423
Households affected
2030
People Affected
2016
Year started
187
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Airport
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

With the capital city for Andhra Pradesh being developed around Vijayawada, the existing airport was sought to be expanded. The “expansion project” for Vijayawada airport included runway expansion and construction of new terminal buildings as per the Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Airports Authority of India (AAI) and the state government.

While initial surveys indicated that 491.92 acres of land were needed to be acquired for the runway expansion, the government ordered the land pooling scheme for the remaining 687 acres as per the environment clearance report. However, the government later decided to take over nearly 1,230 acres of land under the land pooling scheme.

Alongside, the AAI sought to obtain environmental clearance for the expansion of Runway 26, which required the diversion of water from the Eluru canal. The Terms of Reference (TOR) was granted for 148 acres, but eventually the environmental clearance was granted for 698 acres. After the TOR noted that the Eluru canal cuts through the expansion site, the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) report, on which the environment clearance was based, noted that the Eluru canal will not be diverted during the phase of runway expansion. The EIA report also stated that the work does not involve any “major displacement of people”.

In relation to the acquisition proceedings themselves, people have protested at every step and delayed the works to get their demands met. The farmers are unhappy that the government had not taken their views into consideration when it decided to acquire land under the land pooling scheme and not the LARR, 2013, and that clearances were being obtained without prior hearing. They demanded that the matter be settled on priority.

In January 2019, the farmers complained that their plots, which are far away from the project site, had also been damaged. As of August 2019, farmers who had given about 830 acres of land were still awaiting their annuity payments promised to them under the Land Pooling Scheme. They also demanded that the plots allotted to them be developed with necessary infrastructure, as promised while acquiring their lands, and handed over to them at the earliest. 

“The runway works are almost complete, and the other works have reached a final stage. But we still don’t know when we will get the plots. The government should start developing the plots that have been registered in our names and hand them over to us,” the farmers said.

In August 2020, District Collector A. Md. Imtiaz offered Rs 9 lakh each to the 423 families residing in Buddhavaram village under the rehabilitation and resettlement package for the land acquisition for the extension of Vijayawada International Airport at Gannavaram. However, the ground reality remains unchanged as of December 2024.

In 2020, the villagers whose land was acquired for upgrading the airport held demonstrations for two days protesting against the inaction of the Government and demanding fair compensation at the earliest. The locals expressed their disappointment against the government officials for not paying any heed to their demands and for their callous attitude towards providing any form of compensation in exchange for their lands which were acquired seven years ago. In response to this, the state government sanctioned Rs 112.75 crore to resolve pending issues related to the development and expansion of Gannavaram Airport, of which Rs 57.20 crore is earmarked to be spent on shifting of houses from Buddhavaram, Davajigudem and Allapuram villages affected by the airport expansion.

In November 2024, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu set June 2025 as a deadline for completion of the New Integrated Terminal Building of the Vijayawada Airport.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for promised land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Protest against giving their land under Land Pooling Scheme

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

N/A

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2023

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

150

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

2007

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Andhra Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Airports Authority of India

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

YSR Congress Party, Indian National Congress, Communist Party of India (Marxist), Communist Party of India

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rahul Maganti


Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Refusal to give up land for the project

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for promised land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project underway despite protests

Original Project Deadline

2023

Whether the Project has been Delayed

No

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us