Uttarakhand
,
Uttarkashi
,
Uttarkashi
Published :
Sep 2016
|
Updated :
Uttarakhand Government Heeds Public Demand, Allows Development Projects in Eco-sensitive Zone
Reported by
Tarun Joshi
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2013
Year started
417959
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2013
Year started
417959
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The National Wildlife Action Plan, 2002-16, stipulated that state governments should declare land falling within 10 kilometres of the boundaries of national parks and sanctuaries as Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. In 2012, the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC), following a campaign by several environmentalists led by Dr. G D Agarwal, declared an area between Gaumukh to Uttarkashi as an Eco-Sensitive Zone. The campaign was born out of growing dismay among local communities, pilgrims, and environmentalists over the density of dams in the region affecting terrain stability, fish diversity and local ecosystems. This ESZ, known as Bhagirathi is spread over 4,179.56 square kilometres and includes 88 villages.
According to guidelines, activities such as commercial mining and the establishment of sawmills and industries causing pollution are prohibited in such areas. It also prohibits tourism activities like flying over protected areas in an aircraft or in a hot air balloon and discharge of effluents and solid waste in natural water bodies or terrestrial areas. Felling of trees, drastic change in agriculture systems and commercial use of natural water resources, including groundwater harvesting and setting up of hotels and resorts, are also regulated in these areas.
The total area of Uttarkashi is 7,951 square kilometres. Of this, 3,347 square kilometres have already been declared a protected area. With the inclusion of Bhagirathi, 80 per cent of the land in Uttarkashi would come under a protected area, and only 3.5 per cent of land would be left for commercial activities. While organic farming and locally-led animal husbandry and development activities are permitted, commercial infrastructure will be affected. Hence some local people are against the proposed ESZ.
Dehradun-based social activist Avdhash Kaushal threatened to launch an agitation against the 2012 notification, [arguing](https://www.hindustantimes.com/dehradun/no-scientific-backing-behind-centre-notifying-eco-sensitive-zone-in-uttarakhand-activist/story-eEJP5AeHn25JxAPf4U3nrI.html#:~:targetText=Social activist Avdhash Kaushal Tuesday,to procure electricity from outside) that because of the ESZ status Uttarakhand has to spend nearly Rs 1,000 crore every year to buy electricity as no new hydroelectricity projects are allowed. He contended that instead of a blanket ban, the rules should allow construction and commercial activities on the hill slope subject to environmental approval, no loss of green areas and no damage to water resources.
After years of protests by environmentalists and objections by the Uttarakhand government that the notification was 'anti-development, on 16 April 2018, the MoEFCC amended it. Land use change was thus approved to meet local needs, including infrastructure development in larger public interest and national security. It also allowed the cutting of hills in the area and construction on steep slopes.
On 17 July 2020, Union Environment Minister announced the approval of the contentious Zonal Master Plan (ZMP) of the Bhagirathi Eco-Sensitive Zone, paving the way for the Char Dham road project in Uttarakhand. In August, nine eminent scientists, geologists & environmentalists who were either part of a SC-appointed scrutiny group or a NGT-appointed committee for preparation of the ZMP of BESZ said that the ZMP did not have their consent. 
In 2022, the ESZ rules were further amended wherein 'study of Environmental Impacts and complying with their mitigation options' clause was removed for works related to re-construction, disaster mitigation, lift irrigation, hospitals, schools, food godowns and other social infrastructures. The amendment of 2022 further reduced the Centre's oversight of the ESZ as it now allowed amendment to be made by the approval from ‘competent authority of the state government’ and not the MoEF.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

To allow developmental projects following due environmental process for local economy rather than blanket ESZ in the region

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Non-agri rural enterprise, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

10000

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

2014

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

Yes

When did it end?

April 2018

Why did the conflict end?

Community's original demands were met

The Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change amended its 2012 notification to allow development projects in the state following due process of environmental clearance and consent of local communities.

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Forest Department, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

NTPC, UJVNL, THDC

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

No

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local farmers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Tarun Joshi
Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

No items found.

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Agricultural land, Non-agri rural enterprise, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us