Andhra Pradesh
LN Peta and Hiramandalam
,
Gotta
,
Srikakulam
Published :
Jan 2017
|
Updated :
May 2, 2023
Families Displaced by Vamsadhara Project in AP Demand Compensation under LARR Act
Reported by
Rahul Maganti
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
22027
People affected
2005
Year started
4332
Land area affected
Households affected
22027
People Affected
2005
Year started
4332
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Irrigation Dam
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The Andhra Pradesh government proposed the Vamsadhara Project in 1970 in Gotta village in Hiramandalam mandal, Srikakulam district. The project was initially taken up in two stages. Stage 1 was to create a barrage (low-head diversion dam) and the Left main canal to irrigate 398 villages. This was completed by 1977. Stage 2 of the project was intended to create an irrigation potential of 1.07 lakh acres. Later, the government decided to take up Stage 2 in two phases after a delay in obtaining land from Odisha. Work for the first phase began in 2002 and work was almost completed by 2019.
The second phase began in 2005 and the same year, the project received environment clearance. According to the Environment Clearance Report, 34 villages will be affected by the project, which will require 4,332 hectares of land.
About 6,840 families were offered a compensation of INR 1.30 lakh per acre for the second phase of Stage 2. But by the time they received the money, the market price of land had increased. The affected families could not buy alternate land with the compensation, and many turned to daily wage labour to make ends meet.
In 2017, a crowd of over 5,000 people from the affected villages protested at the site of the second phase of Stage 2 of the project. The protesters turned violent, setting fire to official vehicles and attacking the office of the construction company. They demanded revised compensation as per the Land Acquisition Act, 2013.
Following the protests, former Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu assured the people that "there is no reason to panic as land would not be acquired forcibly and adequate compensation would be paid as per the 2013 Land Acquisition rules". The government then appointed 19 special teams to listen to the grievances of the displaced people. The state released an extra INR 193 crore, in addition to the INR 420 crore released earlier. The government also offered INR 5 lakh to eligible youths under the Youth Package. At the same time, the government deployed some 2,000 personnel to guard the reservoir area. Reports suggest that protests have died down in Andhra Pradesh since 2017.
In September 2019, the Vamsadhara Water Dispute Tribunal directed the government to implement its order, issued on April 5 that year, whereby it has asked the Andhra Pradesh and Odisha governments to carry out a joint survey for identifying 106 acres of land for the construction of the second phase of Stage 2.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Non-Forest (Grazing Land), Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

13

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Yes

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Yes, they were produced within 24 hours

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Sections 148, 307, 332, 342, 186, 188

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932

Section 3; Section 7(1)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

Yes they were informed, Yes they had access

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

All the offences were bailable, therefore, a bail application was filed in the court. The court dismissed the application and all the accused were kept in judicial custody for up to 26 days in sub-jail. Further, they were released on bail granted by the District Court vide Crl. MP No. 537/2017 in the name of satisfaction solvency up to 5 days of said order of the district court.

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

B Krishna Murthy, accused & party activist of CPIM Copy of the FIR Testimonial by M. Apparao, Advocate

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

933.99

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

1970

Page Number In Investment Document:

1

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Government of Andhra Pradesh

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Farmers, agricultural labourers

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Arrest

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

13

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Yes

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Yes, they were produced within 24 hours

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Sections 148, 307, 332, 342, 186, 188

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932

Section 3; Section 7(1)

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

Yes they were informed, Yes they had access

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

All the offences were bailable, therefore, a bail application was filed in the court. The court dismissed the application and all the accused were kept in judicial custody for up to 26 days in sub-jail. Further, they were released on bail granted by the District Court vide Crl. MP No. 537/2017 in the name of satisfaction solvency up to 5 days of said order of the district court.

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rahul Maganti


Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Yes, they were produced within 24 hours

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

Yes they were informed, Yes they had access

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Yes

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

All the offences were bailable, therefore, a bail application was filed in the court. The court dismissed the application and all the accused were kept in judicial custody for up to 26 days in sub-jail. Further, they were released on bail granted by the District Court vide Crl. MP No. 537/2017 in the name of satisfaction solvency up to 5 days of said order of the district court.

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project completed

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us