Assam
Tengoni Huijan village (Philobari) and Goriyating, Bishnupur, Tamuli & Betoni villages
,
Kordoiguri village
,
Tinsukia
Published :
Jun 2023
|
Updated :
November 19, 2024
Devastated by 1992 floods, Moran community in Assam's Tinsukia still await resettlement
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
656
Households affected
People affected
1992
Year started
3
ha.
Land area affected
656
Households affected
People Affected
1992
Year started
3
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Natural Calamities
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Land Use
Reason/Cause of conflict
Natural Calamities
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Over 650 families of the indigenous Moran communities, across multiple villages in the Tinsukia district of Assam, remain displaced for more than three decades. The families lost everything to the devastating flood and erosion by the Dangori and Dibru River across multiple villages like Kordoiguri, Bishnupur, Tamuli, Betoni and Goriating of Tinsukia in 1992.  

In June 2022, the Land Advisory Board of Tinsukia district, allotted alternate land to the affected families in Tengoni Huijan village, a land covered by Tea Gardens, around 20 km away from their original village. Each family was allotted 1 bigha (0.3 acre) of land. However, the allotted lands were allegedly encroached upon and occupied by two local businessmen, viz., Sriprakash Lahoti and Rupak Dutta. They set up tea plantations illegally in a large portion of the area. Lahoti further filed a civil suit in the district court against the government's decision. The civil court dismissed the suit and instructed the government departments to resettle the affected families on the said land. Despite such directives, Sriprakash Lahoti returned to the land in question with tea garden workers and forcefully evicted the eligible settlers from the land. And, threatened them not to return.

Hundreds of them currently live in bamboo huts, temporary flood shelters and tarpaulin tents with women and children.

While speaking to LCW, Lohit Moran, who is a representative of the affected community and Kordoiguir Anchalik Yubak Sangha, a local grassroots organization, said, "Since 1992, more than 20 villages disappeared as a result of flood and erosion. In 2018, an elder of the village, Padmadhar Moran died from flood erosion. It's so unfortunate that for more than 20 years, a vast amount of government land is being illegally encroached upon by local businessmen and other wealthy groups, yet, no action has been taken so far."

Bhaben Moran, one of the affected community members told LCW, "We need justice. We have lost all of our lands to flood erosion. Can you see under what conditions we are living in this school playground? We have given up on all our hopes. Please help us." 

Rubel Moran, one of 24 affected community members, stated, "Since the 1992 flood and erosion, we've lost our homes and land in Kordoiguri, Tinsukia. Despite promises of resettlement, we remain sheltered in the Kordoiguri school playground. As daily wage workers, it's difficult to afford our children's education. We urge the government to provide fair compensation and proper resettlement."

Despite legal decisions, political commitments, and administrative assurances, none of the 650 families belonging to the Indigenous Moran community have been properly rehabilitated or provided with land rights or pattas. Many families currently living under precarious conditions on the eroding river banks of the Brahmaputra River, are facing constant threats to their lives and lacking a reliable source of income.

The devastating floods have consumed everything they once had, including their possibilities of finding a new place to rebuild their homes and lives, leaving these flood-affected Indigenous communities in an abyss.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Resettlement on the land allotted by the Government encroached by local businessmen

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Doomdooma circle office, Deputy commissioner Tinsukia (ceiling & settlement branch), Land advisory board of Assam (Tinsukia), Revenue and Disaster Management Department of Assam

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Moran Yuva Parishad, Kordoiguri Anchalik Yubak Sangha, Asom Moran Sabha (AMS)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us