Punjab
,
Kansal
,
S.A.S Nagar
Published :
Oct 2016
|
Updated :
Punjab Residents Living around Sukhna Lake's Catchment Area Protest Demolition of Buildings
Reported by
Lakhvinder Singh
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
173
People affected
Year started
Land area affected
Households affected
173
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Since 2011, intense construction, much of it by influential individuals, in the villages of Kaimbwala and Khuda Ali Sher in Chandigarh, parts of Kansal in Punjab and parts of Saketri in Haryana have been taking place close to the catchment area of the ecologically sensitive Sukhna Lake.
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana had banned new constructions in the area in an order issued on March 14, 2011. However, illegal construction after 2011 continued.
Baljinder Kaur, president of MC Naya Gaon, had pointed out the lack of assistance from the administration and police in carrying out a demolition drive of illegal constructions. Additionally, even the Delhi high court had banned all construction activities in the lake's catchment area in the Camelot project in 2017. Later, the Supreme Court, in its judgment on November 5, 2019, upheld the verdict of the Delhi high court, which had rejected the proposal of a 95-metre-high and 28-storeyed building project named Camelot in Punjab's Kansal, falling in the catchment area of the lake.
In its more recent order in March 2020, the Punjab and Haryana high court penalised both the states for permitting the illegal constructions and fined them INR 100 crore each as damages for restoration of the catchment area of the Lake. The Chandigarh Administration had notified Sukhna Lake as a wetland under the Wetland (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017, which is also expected to aid in preventing damaging construction activities in the catchment area.
Many of the affected residents have protested against the court order. Harjot Singh Oberoi, president of the Kansal Residents Protection of Rights Association in Punjab, was quoted in a news report as saying, “We have formed a joint action committee and have decided to move the Supreme Court on this matter.”
Construction activities, meanwhile, have continued unabated with the pandemic lockdown delaying the execution of the court order.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against demolition drive

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Municipal corporation of Zirakpur

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Pvt. Estate companies

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local residents, Kansal Residents Protection of Rights Association

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Lakhvinder Singh
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us