Manipur
Thangjing hills
,
K. Songjang, Henglep sub-division, Kungpi Naosen, Moirang
,
Churachandpur, Bishnupur, Noney, Ukhrul, Kangpokpi, Tengnoupal and Jiribam
Published :
Apr 2023
|
Updated :
Declaration of village land as protected forest areas in the hill district of Manipur triggers statewide protests
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
25
Households affected
120
People affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
25
Households affected
120
People Affected
2023
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Forest Administration (Other than Protected Areas)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

On February 20, 2023, the Noney Forest Division and police teams from Noney, Kangpokpi, and Bishnupur districts, evicted the residents of K. Songjang, a Kuki tribal village in the Churachandpur district of Manipur.

The state government notified and carried out the eviction drive, deploying hundreds of police personnel and paramilitary forces to evict around 12 families at K. Songjang, saying the village was recently set up and was encroaching on the Churachandpur-Khoupum protected forest stretch. The Manipur Forest Department issued a clarification that K. Songjang village is a new settlement established in 2021, much after the notification of the Protected Forest in 1966, and, violates state forest conservation laws. The villagers, mostly farmers, had cultivated lemon, yongchak (tree beans), and banana trees, grew and sold crops such as chickpeas, cabbage, Hawai thrak (a type of pea), ginger, potatoes, and chak hawai beans, the most profitable of the lot. Back on February 15, the Deputy Commissioner of Churachandpur district ordered a verification drive in several villages under the Churachandpur and Mualnuam sub-divisions in South Manipur to identify the villagers, whom they termed to be ‘illegal immigrants' from Myanmar. A show cause notice was also served to the Kungpi Naosen village in the same district, directing the villagers to vacate the land for the same reason. 

To resist such actions, the Indigenous Tribal Leaders’ Forum (ITLF), a newly formed conglomerate of tribal groups, and the Kuki Students Union (KSO) organised mass rallies in all the hills districts to protest evictions. Protests were also held at Delhi's Jantar Mantar. 

A complaint was filed before the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) on March 5, 2023, to quash the notification declaring the area as a forest land and against the wrongful use of police force. A notice was issued by the NCST to the state government on March 14, 2023, asking the government to share all facts on the issue and the action taken report within fifteen days.

Douminlal, a 31-year-old former resident recalling the tragic events, told The Print, “They came with six JCBs and uncountable police and forest personnel. They threw stones at the poultry coops, took away the chickens, destroyed the pigsty, and towed away the squealing pigs.”

While speaking to LCW, leaders of local organisations emphasised how their ancestral land is under attack, and even after multiple appeals and requests, the current government launched a scathing attack targeting one specific community and their inheritance. 

“Land is a kind of identity for the people. The tribal people are deeply attached to their land. But because of government policies or undue processes followed in the declaration of reserved forests, protected forests, or wetlands, there were a lot of grievances among the affected people. This and various other issues led to the Tribal Solidarity March on May 3,” said Mangcha Haokip, a research scholar from Churachandpur.

Robert Thongkholal Haokip, an expert on North Eastern affairs, and an Assistant Professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University, stated that the state government has declared a large portion of tribal-owned and inhabited hill areas as its land circumventing the forest-dwelling communities by depriving them of a consultation. They have also been subjected to land grabs, forced displacement, and exploitation of natural resources, leading to poverty, social unrest, and loss of cultural identity. 

Several mass protests took place in March over the evictions, and the state witnessed another massive flare-up on May 3 after the 'Tribal Solidarity March' called in protest against the demand for Scheduled Tribe status by a section of Meiteis. The rally organised in the hill districts of the state to protest the Meitei community’s demand for the Scheduled Tribe (ST) status turned violent and opened old fault lines between the two communities i.e. Meitei and Kukis, reigniting the ethnic conflict. Until August 2023, over 160 people (mostly Kukis) reportedly died, over 300 were injured, with tens of thousands reported to have been displaced since the May 3 incident. Reports suggest that hundreds sustained bullet injuries and brutal wounds during the violence.

Numerous human rights violations were also reported during this conflict, with 220 churches, 116 villages, and 39 houses being burnt down and destroyed during this ethnic conflict. Despite multiple appeals and redressal requests, allegedly no action was taken by the state government to address the concerns of the people, local organisations, and representative bodies in due time, which further fueled the rising tensions.

As of October 2023, all the displaced people, including children, from K. Songjang were taking shelter in the next Kuki village of Joujangtek, about 4 kilometres away.

On 19 February 2024, the Manipur government dismissed claims made by the Kuki-Zomi tribe over the Thangjing Hills, and said, "The present-day Thangjing hill range falls within the Churachandpur-Khoupum protected forests... The present-day Ukha-Loikhai settlement falls within the boundary of this protected forest."

Even in the months before the ethnic conflict began in 2023, the two communities had clashed with each other over worshipping rights on the hill range the year before. After a Kuki students’ body issued a statement barring Meitei people from visiting the hill range, a Meitei body had issued a statement barring Kuki-Zomi people from the nearest town’s main market.

The Manipur government also cancelled the notification that had put the Kuki-Zomi village out of the jurisdiction of the Churachandpur-Khoupum Protected Forests. The move allowed the officials to qualify the Ukha-Loikhai settlement as encroachment on protected lands.

Months after the ethnic conflict began in 2023, the NCST took cognisance of the complaint and it too started an investigation by invoking its powers as a civil court.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

1. Demand for a Southern Manipur Autonomous Territorial Council 2. Demand to stop the Govt. from acquiring indigenous tribal land by unconstitutionally declaring it as protected forest areas like Reserved forests, protected forest areas, Wildlife sanctuaries etc.

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

20

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

CrPC Section 144

Section 144 [The district magistrate has the power to issue orders to prevent obstruction, injury, or danger to human life. Orders can be issued to prevent public gatherings and suspend internet connection to prevent further violence]

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Agricultural land, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Manipur forest department, Noney Forest Division, Office of the Deputy commissioner (Churachandpur), (Noney) (Kangpokpi)

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Yes

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Kuki Sudents' Union (KSO), Kuki Innpi Manipur (KIM)

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

Detention

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

20

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Out on bail

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

Don't know

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

CrPC Section 144

Section 144 [The district magistrate has the power to issue orders to prevent obstruction, injury, or danger to human life. Orders can be issued to prevent public gatherings and suspend internet connection to prevent further violence]

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
East Street Journal Asia

East Street Journal Asia is a multilingual, Web-based news journal. It is an independent media organisation whose goal is to make transparent, unbiased and data-driven journalism accessible to all.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Demand for legal recognition of land rights

Complaint against procedural violations

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Residential area, Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Religious/Sacred/Cultural value, Agricultural land, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us