Jammu and Kashmir
,
,
Srinagar
Published :
May 2020
|
Updated :
Dal Dwellers Face Eviction, Lose Livelihood in Name of Lake Conservation
Reported by
Rabiya Bashir
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
10944
People affected
2011
Year started
75
Land area affected
Households affected
10944
People Affected
2011
Year started
75
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Urban Development (Other than Smart Cities)
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

Dal Lake is home to and the main source of livelihood for a population of more than 50,000, a majority of them belonging to the Hanji community. The Hanji community earns their livelihood from the lake by engaging in various activities, such as fishing, growing vegetables like nadru (lotus stem) and haak (green leafy vegetable), ferrying tourists in shikaras and collecting water lilies for cows, although some of them also practise farming. The Dal dwellers,** who have been living on the banks of Dal Lake in Srinagar for generations, have been forcefully evicted by the state in the name of conservation of the lake. The 'relocation' is scheduled to be completed by 2025. The eviction drive, which began in 2011, is seen as a move to implement the 'Save Dal Project' which was introduced in 1997. According to the state's Lakes and Waterways Development Authority (LAWDA), the project comprises two components: conservation and rehabilitation. While fruitful conservation efforts are yet to be seen, the state is facing backlash for its rehabilitation effort.  In 2007, the Lakes and Waterways Development Authority announced a plan to prepare housing plots for Dal dwellers at the Rakhe Arth wetland colony in Bemina, on the outskirts of Srinagar. As part of the conservation of the lake, more than 2,000 families have been forcefully evicted from 75 hectares of land so far, as told to LCW by a junior government official, speaking on the condition of anonymity. In the process, their movable assets, including livestock and agricultural produce and equipment, have also been displaced. The relocation and rehabilitation project began in 2010 with the aim to move 9,461 families from Dal Lake to RakheArth. However, the land on which the colony is built is a wetland and not suitable for rehabilitation. Many of the houses that the government constructed for rehabilitation **have developed cracks or have skidded off, risking the lives of families residing there. The roads have potholes and the colony is also lacking in adequate educational and primary healthcare facilities. They are distressed as their livelihood is totally dependent on the lake and has been severely disrupted due to the relocation, with many struggling to subsist themselves. Although the affected people accepted the compensation package of INR 10 lakh per family offered by the government, they have realized it is not enough to cover their losses and have demanded that the government relocate them back to the lake. A group of people organized themselves in February 2020, at Nehru Park, urging the government to not proceed with its plan. On October 11, 2020, as per government instruction, LAWDA submitted a Detailed Report Project of INR 291crore for RakheArth. Ghulam Rasool Akhoon, president of Dal Dwellers Welfare Union, told LCW that focusing on the Hanji community diverts public attention from the dismal administrative performance of the government authorities, including the states judiciary. The eviction is another attempt to use the Hanji community as a scapegoat for the deterioration of the Dal. They must get appropriate compensation as per their property values and also be relocated to the Dal Lake, he added. In a 2021 report by Gaon Connection, Foqiya Iftikhar, junior engineer, LAWDA RakheArth sub division, conveyed that the developmental work in the relocation site had come to a standstill due to the COVID19 pandemic and nonpayment of the fees of contractors.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Relocation to original land.

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

416.72

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

J&K Lakes and Waterways Development Authority

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Rabiya Bashir

Rabiya is an independent journalist based in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, having completed her Master’s in Journalism and Mass Communication. With a field experience of seven years, she has worked with regional and national media houses in Delhi and Srinagar. Her work focuses on environment, politics, women, health, culture and human rights, with her primary focus being on climate change, renewable energy, forest, food security, sustainable food and agriculture.

Show more work
Latest updates
East Jaintia Hills
Meghalaya

Violent protest during public hearing for cement plant expansion in Meghalaya's East Jaintia Hills

Narela
Delhi

Residents of Narela's Bajitpur Thakran oppose demolition of temples for defence institute, demand sports complex

Surguja
Chhattisgarh

Adivasis in Chhattisgarh's Hasdeo protest relentlessly against mining project in forest

Kamrup Metropolitan
Assam

Lawyer bodies protest against Assam government’s decision to relocate Gauhati High Court

Faizabad
Uttar Pradesh

Demands for Ram Temple, Babri Mosque at same site divides Ayodhya

Mumbai
Maharashtra

Supreme Court Allows Land Reclamation for Mumbai Coastal Road Project

Pune
Maharashtra

Farmers Refuse Land for Pune Outer Ring Road Project in Maharashtra

Surat
Gujarat

Slum Dwellers in Gujarat's Surat Stage Protest against Demolition, Forced Eviction

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand for compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us