Rajasthan
,
Gopalpura
,
Churu
Published :
Apr 2023
|
Updated :
Community members oppose reduction in eco-sensitive zone limits of Tal Chhapar Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan
Reported by
Nayantara Lakshman
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
983
Households affected
People affected
Year started
Land area affected
983
Households affected
People Affected
Year started
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Ended
Sector
Conservation and Forestry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Protected Areas
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Ended
1
Summary

In April 2022, residents of Gopalpura panchayat, led by its Sarpanch (or head representative), Savita Rathi, began a sit-in and hunger strike in Rajasthan. Located in Churu district, Gopalpura residents were opposing the state government's decision to reduce the limits of the eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) around the Talchhapar sanctuary.

Community members claimed the government's decision came in the face of pressure by companies that carry out mining and stone crushing located within a radius of 10 Km of the sanctuary. The panchayat residents are concerned that a reduction in the ESZ's area would impact the flora and fauna of the area. They are also concerned about the damage it might do to the 'oran' or sacred groves hillock called Balaji ki dungri (hills), which lies in the ESZ. Speaking to LCW, Savita Rathi said, "the Balaji ki Dungri is about 500 bighas of common land that is used by the community members for grazing their animals".

The rainfall received on the hillocks percolate into talabs or ponds to provide water for the wildlife and communities in and around the national park. Exclusion of this area from ESZ would be detrimental to the community as they still depend on the land and the talaab behind the land," added Rathi.

The Talchappar sanctuary is home to many protected wild animals, including Blackbuck, which is considered sacred by the Bishnoi community of the area. Keen to protect the animal, they along with other communities came together to protest against the mining activities. This was covered by the local media. Mining activities have been going on in the area for quite some time now, but outside the ESZ. But over the last few years, water has been percolating in the mining pits, rather than the talaab - which is the main source of water for the community and wildlife.

Taking note of the news, Jodhpur High Court took up this matter on a suo moto basis as a public interest litigation in April, 2022. The court ordered a stay on any reduction of the limits of the Talchappar sanctuary. In August 2022, the High Court issued certain directives to multiple government agencies to ensure protection of wildlife, particularly Blackbuck. These agencies were required to submit a compliance report regarding this to the court in November 2022.

In_ June _2022, the Supreme Court while addressing another matter in Goa, passed an order stating that a minimum width of 1 km must be maintained for eco-sensitive zones around protected areas. According to Aman Singh, founder of KRAPAVIS, a civil society organisation based in Rajasthan, in August 2022, the High Court then referred the decision made by the Supreme court. Following which the Rajasthan State Government was asked whether they are in favour of keeping the range as it is or reducing it to 1 km. The High Court also mentioned that the communities can approach the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) to challenge the 1 km range.

The community members LCW spoke with informed that they are in the process of approaching the CEC.** **

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to reverse decision of reducing extent of eco-sensitive zone around Tal Chappar Wildlife Sanctuary

Region Classification

Type of Land

Common

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Rajasthan State Forest Department, Rajasthan State Revenue Department, Rajasthan State Mining Department, and District Collector of Churu

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Mining and stone crusher companies operating in the area

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Local communities, Gram Panchayat, Local activists, Sarpanch of Gopalpura Gram Panchayat- Savita Rathi

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Nayantara Lakshman

Nayantara is a developmental practitioner, researcher, and journalist who works in the field of community conservation. Her interest lies in understanding how traditional knowledge systems can be integrated into current developmental policies and practices to ensure the future sustenance of forest communities, coastal communities, agricultural communities, and pastoralists- and their role in safeguarding the ecosystems they depend on.

Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Opposition against environmental degradation

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us