Assam
,
Jorhat
,
Jorhat
Published :
|
Updated :
Cinnamara tea estate workers oppose land allocation for tourism project
Reported by
Emilo Yanthan
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Sourabh Rai, Amrita Chekkutty
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
People affected
2025
Year started
27
ha.
Land area affected
Households affected
People Affected
2025
Year started
27
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
Sector
Industry
Reason/Cause of conflict
Tourism
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Urban
Ended
1
Summary

In January 2025, Cinnamara tea estate workers started an indefinite protest against the government's move to earmark 200 bighas of the land for a tourism project. Launched by the Assam Tea Corporation, the project has caused concern among the workers, who are worried about potential job cuts and increased exploitation.

Balram Kondhai, a member of the Assam Tea Mazdoor Sangh, stated, “A year ago, we were verbally informed by the administration about the 200-bigha tourism project at Cinnamara Tea Estate”. He added that a memorandum was submitted by the Sangh to the Chief Minister through the Jorhat District Commissioner where they raised their opposition to the project.

Kondhai said “We clearly stated that if the government proceeds without consulting us, we will protest. Yesterday, without any notice or discussion, work began on the land. This has forced us to start an indefinite protest. What will we do if we lose the garden? This garden has fed us for generations.” 

The protesters alleged that the tea workers had been used for vote banks. Kondhai added, “If the tourism project goes ahead, hundreds of workers will lose their jobs. The government should focus on improving our living standards instead of taking away our livelihood.”

The workers voiced their anger over the looming threat of displacement and the suspension of transfers and promotions within the tea garden community. With many families already facing financial hardship, the situation has only added to their distress. Another worker said, “We want work. We have children to feed, and we need the garden to ensure jobs for the next generation. The number of unemployed in our community is growing because the government has stopped our transfers and promotions.”

Further fuelling their frustrations is the construction of temples within the garden area. The worker added, “We’ve seen temples being built on tea garden land. But those temples won’t put food on our plates. Our survival depends on the tea gardens.”

The tea workers have insisted on an immediate stop to the tourism project and have urged the government for a dialogue.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Urban

Type of Land

Common

Non-Forest (Other than Grazing Land)

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

District Administration of Jorhat

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Assam Tea Corporation

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Assam Tea Mazdoor Sangh

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Show more work
Latest updates
Karbi Anglong
Assam

Controversy erupts over Assam's 1000 MW solar power project in Karbi Anglong

Chengalpattu
Tamil Nadu

EC for Sun Pharma's expansion in Vedanthangal bird sanctuary put to abeyance

Purulia
West Bengal

Land acquisition for Turga storage project in West Bengal violates FRA

Hooghly
West Bengal

Hooghly residents in West Bengal oppose railway project over water body

Paschim Medinipur
West Bengal

Jindal Group returns land to West Bengal government, land losers demand jobs

Sundergarh
Odisha

Villagers in Odisha's Sundergarh protest over delay in R&R settlement for land acquired in 1988 for Mahanadi Coalfields

Nuapada
Odisha

Displaced people of Lower Indra Irrigation project await rehabilitation

Jajpur
Odisha

Farmers affected by Angul-Sukinda railway line in Odisha demand adequate compensation

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to cancel the project

Complaint against procedural violations

Refusal to give up land for the project

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Commercial

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us