Goa
,
Candola
,
North Goa
Published :
May 2017
|
Updated :
Bombay High Court Rejects Clearance to Residential Project Proposed in North Goa
Reported by
Nihar Gokhale
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
850
Households affected
1920
People affected
2012
Year started
126
Land area affected
850
Households affected
1920
People Affected
2012
Year started
126
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Infrastructure
Reason/Cause of conflict
Township/Real Estate
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

Gera Developers, a real-estate firm in Goa and Maharashtra, had proposed to build a residential colony, "Enchanted Woods", on a hillock in Khandola in Goa. The residents opposed the project, saying that the hillock consisted of forest area and cashew plantations and that it was integral to water security and ecological balance in the area.
When the project work began in 2012, the residents protested by blocking trucks from going to the site. They formed a committee, the Betki Khandola Samvardhan Samiti, which began collecting evidence against the project. Using the Right to Information, they found that the project was granted environmental clearance (EC) and a no-objection certificate by the Khandola panchayat in 2011, which was not made public. They also found that the Town and Country Planning (TCP) Department, which approves projects on land-use grounds, approved the plan that indicated construction on a steep slope, which is a no-development zone as per zoning laws. In 2014, the Samiti filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the clearance.
Inspections ordered by the court further revealed that while the EC was for a residential project for 600 people, the TCP Department's clearance was for 2,500 people. The Samiti also pointed out that the clearance did not mention any flora, fauna or forests, while its own survey had revealed 14,000 square metres of densely forested area.
On September 9, 2014, the high court disposed of the petition as the TCP Department said it had received a revised proposal, which was under consideration. The court ordered the department to hear the petitioners while considering the application. A revised TCP clearance to the project was granted in March 2015, while the panchayat granted a new construction licence in November 2015, both of which were challenged by the Samiti in a fresh case before the high Court.
On September 27, 2018, a division bench of the high court quashed the new TCP clearance as well as the licence granted by the panchayat on the ground that the authorities did not properly evaluate the impact of the project on water security, sanitation and traffic congestion. The court directed the government to evaluate any fresh application for the project considering these factors. While hearing the matter again in January 2020, the court permitted the petitioner to submit additional documents as evidence.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Common and Private

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Betki-Khandola-locals-hold-protest-over-ecology-issues/articleshow/26333588.cms> <https://www.heraldgoa.in/Goa/The-Sunday-Roundtable/khandola-residents-want-mega-project-scrapped/70937> <http://ingoanews.com/cancel-permit-for-gera-project-demand-betki-khandola-locals/>

Total investment involved (in Crores):

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Betqui-Candola panchayat, Town and Country Planning Department; Department of Science, Technology and Environment

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Gera Developers Private Limited, Sadekar Enviro Engineers Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Betki Khandola Samvardhan Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Nihar Gokhale
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Demand to retain/protect access to common land/resources

Complaint against procedural violations

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Project stalled

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Yes

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Other Natural Resource extraction/dependence, Other environmental services

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Yes

Source/Reference

<https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Betki-Khandola-locals-hold-protest-over-ecology-issues/articleshow/26333588.cms> <https://www.heraldgoa.in/Goa/The-Sunday-Roundtable/khandola-residents-want-mega-project-scrapped/70937> <http://ingoanews.com/cancel-permit-for-gera-project-demand-betki-khandola-locals/>

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us