Chhattisgarh
Boddavalasa, Tekilova, Bittara tonki, Bodikonda and Badidevara Konda villages
,
Bhengari
,
Raigarh
Published :
Jun 2017
|
Updated :
Adivasis Allege Forgery in Land Acquisition for Thermal Plant in Chhattisgarh's Raipur
Reported by
Asha Verma
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
120
People affected
2009
Year started
405
Land area affected
Households affected
120
People Affected
2009
Year started
405
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Power
Reason/Cause of conflict
Thermal Power Plant
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

The residents of Benghari, Khokhraoma, Katangdi and Nawapara Tenda villages in Gharghoda tehsil of Raigarh district have alleged illegal acquisition for a thermal power plant project. Between 2009 and 2015, Mahavir Energy and Coal Beneficiation Limited (MECBL) had reportedly acquired land for a 540megawatt thermal power plant in the region. But the tribes have accused the company of forgery.  Company officials had reportedly coerced Bhengari residents to sell their land. An Amnesty International correspondent spoke to Kalamati Rathia, an adivasi woman from the village, who said: "I had two acres of farmland in Bhengari, which I got from my father. A middleman for Mahaveer frequently visited us and compelled us to sell our land. One day, along with other villagers, they took me to another persons house where they took my signature and gave me INR 2,000. We thought that the company had purchased our land, but the sale deed listed someone else's name as purchaser." Similar incidents of forgery were reported from nearby villages where another company, TRN Energy Private Limited, used threats and intimidation to displace tribespeople from their lands. This led to the Gram Sabhas of these villages to pass a resolution against both the companies in 2015 and 2016. The resolution mentioned that their lands had been purchased through fraud and coercion. In a similar case of land transfer through forgery in Kunkuni village, on May 9, 2017, the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes directed the Raigarh district administration to take necessary action under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in cases where adivasi land was illegally transferred to other people. The order followed allegations that over 300 acres of tribal land had been unlawfully transferred to nontribal people in Raigarh between 2009 and 2015. On June 14, 2017, around 150 tribal people from four villages in Raigarh came together at the district Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Welfare (Special) police station to submit criminal complaints against MECBL and TRN Energy under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. While the police accepted the complaints, they informed the aggrieved persons that a formal FIR would be lodged only after a preliminary enquiry to determine if a cognizable offence had been committed or not. However, reportedly, the villagers claimed that the police did not record the statements from many of the affected households. Amnesty International India wrote to TRN Energy on April 27, 2017, and to MECBL on May 3, 2017, seeking their response to the allegations. Both the companies have not responded to date. The farmers whose lands were taken away have been demanding the return of their land, while some farmers whose land was acquired at low prices have demanded better compensation. In December, the commission also directed the District Magistrate to present records for TRN Energy in Gharghoda tehsil in response to the allegations of illegal land acquisition. A 2018 news report noted that while the villagers continued to protest, the police was yet to file an FIR based on the allegations.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand to get back acquired land

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Private

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

2074

Type of investment:

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Mahavir Energy and Coal Benefication Limited, TRN Energy Private Limited

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Janchetna, Amnesty International, People’s Union for Civil Liberties

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Asha Verma
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for more compensation than promised

Demand to get back acquired land

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us