Chhattisgarh
Kesra and Sapnadar villages
,
Kudaridih
,
Surguja
Published :
Jul 2017
|
Updated :
BALCO Mainpat Bauxite Mine in Chhattisgarh Shut Down; Compensation, Rehabilitation Remain Incomplete
Reported by
Siddhant Kalra
Legal Review by
Anmol Gupta
Edited by
Anupa Kujur
Households affected
538
People affected
1992
Year started
639
Land area affected
Households affected
538
People Affected
1992
Year started
639
Land area affected
Key Insights
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Bauxite Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
Sector
Mining
Reason/Cause of conflict
Bauxite Mining
Conflict Status
Ongoing
Ended
Legal Status
Region Classification
Rural
Ended
1
Summary

In Chhattisgarh, projectaffected people of BALCO Mainpat Bauxite Mines continue to wait for the promised resettlement and rehabilitation even after the mine has been shut down.   Bauxite mining in Mainpat tehsil in Surguja district (erstwhile Madhya Pradesh) began in 1993 under Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO). About 639 hectares of land were leased to the company. This rendered small farms unsuitable for cultivation, affected the environment adversely and displaced hundreds of families, mainly from the Manjhi, Kanwar and Pahadi Korwa tribes.  Officially, the project displaced 95 families in three villages. Reportedly, those who were compensated received only INR 12,000 per acre as opposed to INR 50,000 per acre that was promised. With the creation of Chhattisgarh in 2000, BALCO's ownership was bought over by Sterlite group, a subsidiary of Vedanta Resources. The new management failed to deliver on the compensation promise.  In 2007, Jagardev Yadav, a villager, was reportedly beaten up and jailed for protesting against the lack of rehabilitation by Sterlite. The same year, another resident, Somnath Manjhi, had reported that extractive activities had rendered the soil useless, which led to diseases and posed health hazards to the residents. In October 2007, the Expert Appraisal Committee of the environment ministry rejected BALCOs proposal for extending the environmental clearance citing poor performance in conserving the biodiversity and ensuring rehabilitation. Subsequently, a court case was filed against the company for exceeding the capacity grant. However, despite complaints of rehabilitation and environmental violations filed with government bodies, the mine received both forest clearance in 2008 and a lease extension for another 10 years in 2012.  In 2016, BALCO proposed to expand the production capacity in Mainpat from 0.75 to 2.25 million tonnes per annum. To secure local consent for expansion, a public hearing was held on April 4 that year, which concluded unsuccessfully. The villagers protested against the government's failure to grant compensation and employment for the displacement that first took place in 1993. They also cited procedural violations, discrepancies in rehabilitation policy and environmental and public health concerns to oppose the expansion plans.  Attorney Sanjay Ambasht noted that the public hearing was void without BALCOs fulfilment of a prior Chhattisgarh high court order, which had directed BALCO to fulfil 12 conditions on environmental, human rights and rural development concerns. The company had failed to heed the order and had proceeded with the public hearing anyway. Currently, BALCO cannot proceed with the expansion of Mainpat mine.  In March 2019, BALCO delisted the expansion proposal, and in September, the company decided to temporarily shut down mining activities from October 10. But the issues of resettlement and rehabilitation for the families displaced is 1993 are yet to be addressed.

2
Fact Sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for employment

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Opposition against environmental degradation

Other Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Region Classification

Rural

Type of Land

Both

Forest and Non-Forest

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Details of sources (names of accused, names and numbers of any lawyers, names of any police officers contacted)

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

Total investment involved (in Crores):

11

Type of investment:

Cost of Project

Year of Estimation

Page Number In Investment Document:

Has the Conflict Ended?

No

When did it end?

Why did the conflict end?

4
Additional Information

Government Departments Involved in the Conflict:

Chhattisgarh State Government

PSUs Involved in the Conflict:

Did LCW Approach Government Authorities for Comments?

No

Name, Designation and Comment of the Government Authorities Approached

Corporate Parties Involved in the Conflict:

Bharat Aluminium Company Limited (BALCO), Vedanta Resources

Did LCW Approach Corporate Parties for Comments?

Communities/Local Organisations in the Conflict:

Mainpat Bachao Sangharsh Samiti

5
Information on the use of criminal law

What was the action taken by the police?

How many people did the police detain or arrest?

What is the current status of the detained/accused persons?

Did the person face any violence while in police custody?

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

If the accused was not produced before a magistrate within 24 hours, or not produced at all, what were the reasons?

Legislation under which the accused was charged

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Legal Supporting Documents

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Author
Reported by
Siddhant Kalra
Show more work
Latest updates
Nagaon
Assam

Farmers in Assam resist land acquisition for solar plant, beaten by police

Surat
Gujarat

Surat farmers claim fertile land re-included in Gujarat's development plan without consent

Gadchiroli
Maharashtra

Villagers in Gadchiroli campaign to shut down Surjagarh iron ore mine

Biswanath
Assam

Encroachment, land dispute pose threat to newly designated Behali Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam

Krishnagiri
Tamil Nadu

Residents in Krishnagiri protest against takeover of land by SIPCOT

Lower Siang
Arunachal Pradesh

Tension in Arunachal's Lower Siang over Likabali-Durpai road project amid boundary disputes

Kanyakumari
Tamil Nadu

Tamil Nadu revives plan to construct Kanyakumari Port despite protests by fisherfolk

Koraput
Odisha

Bauxite mining at Mali Parbat in Koraput seeks to displace and disrupt local livelihoods

Fact sheet

Demand/Contention of the Affected Community

Complaint against procedural violations

Demand for employment

Demand for promised compensation

Demand for rehabilitation

Opposition against environmental degradation

If any arrests took place, were the accused persons produced before a judge within 24 hours of the arrest?

Was the accused person informed of their right to legal representation? Did the accused person have access to legal aid?

In cases where the accused person approached the court for bail, was bail granted?

Why was bail granted or rejected? If granted, what were the bail conditions and quantum of bail?

Were there any other notable irregularities that took place, or other significant details?

Status of Project

Original Project Deadline

Whether the Project has been Delayed

Significance of Land to Land Owners/Users

Whether the project was stalled due to land conflict

Source/Reference

JOIN
THE LCW COMMUNITY
Exclusive monthly policy briefs, stories from the ground, Quarterly Analytics report, Curated Expert talks, merchandise and much more.


Support our work.
Sign Up Today
Conflicts Map
Conflict Database
About Us